Mastering OChem Nomenclature: Solving 3 Challenging Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthem26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges related to organic chemistry nomenclature, specifically naming compounds and drawing molecular structures. The first problem is identified as N-ethyl methyl amine, which can also be formatted without spaces. The second problem is named diethyl amine, while the third problem is categorized as a primary amine due to having only one functional group. Participants are encouraged to assist with these naming and drawing tasks to help complete the homework. The thread emphasizes the importance of mastering OChem nomenclature for academic success.
Anthem26
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to finish my ochem homework, but I'm having difficulty solving these 3 problems. I'm suppose to name 2 of them while the third asks me to draw the model. Hopefully someone can take their time and help me.


First problem:
http://imgur.com/3FJEi.png

Second problem:
http://imgur.com/fnmNH.png

Third problem:
http://imgur.com/5OMWS.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. N-ethyl methyl amine (can also be written with no spaces and no N)

2. diethyl amine

3. primary amine because there's only one functional group bonded to it
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

What Is the Correct Name for This Organic Compound?
Replies
2
Views
2K
How Do You Draw Correct Resonance Structures for H3CHCHC=NH?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Geometry Proof: Tips & Theorems to Solve It
Replies
9
Views
2K
Interference of light, emission spectroscopy prac. report
Replies
1
Views
2K
For the life of me I can't solve this integral sqrt(1-x^3)
Replies
4
Views
3K
What is happening in this fluid dynamics problem and how can we approach it?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Solving a circuit using both the mesh and node analysis
Replies
3
Views
2K
Kinematics problem: Ball rolling off ramp & table
Replies
2
Views
4K
Projectile trajectory problem with constraint
Replies
5
Views
2K
Physics GRE first time practicing -- Need advice for improvement
Replies
17
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top