Masters in Financial Mathematics: Is it Right for Me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ktheo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate student majoring in mathematics and economics who is preparing to apply for a master's in financial mathematics (MMF) at the University of Toronto and other institutions. Despite struggling with math in the past, the student has developed a strong interest in finance and self-trading, which has motivated the pursuit of this advanced degree. The student expresses frustration with their current mathematical economics class, particularly the focus on set theory, and seeks clarity on the differences between mathematical economics and financial mathematics. Key points highlight that mathematical economics encompasses a wide range of topics, including game theory and econometrics, while financial mathematics is more focused on stochastic calculus, partial differential equations, and numerical analysis. The discussion emphasizes that the approach to financial mathematics can vary, either from a mathematical or financial perspective, influencing how models and theories are developed and applied in the field.
ktheo
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm an undergraduate in a mathematics & economics double major right now. I have struggled pretty hard with math in the past (even failed many times) but I have pretty much developed the resolve to see it through because I enjoy it and I think the challenge is actually quite defining. I'll actually be graduating after this year, and my plan is to apply for the masters in financial mathematics (MMF) at the University of Toronto and a couple other schools.

The kicker is that I have never done any strictly financial mathematics. I know it seems weird to want to apply to do a whole masters on the subject, but I am moderately proficient as a self-trader (was able to make very large contributions to my school costs) and I am very interested in finance so I figured with my skillset, it was the best route. I also like applied math very much over pure.

I'm taking my first "mathematical economics" class right now, and I hate it. I loathe it. We are essentially re-doing all of set theory with binary relations, which when I took in algebraic group theory, almost drove me right out of mathematics... if this guy starts talking about homomorphisms and rings I might actually jump out the window to avoid having to go through it again. I was just wondering: is financial math similar to economic math? I was under the impression that financial maths was largely set in probability, stochastic calculus, regression/sampling, and things like Markov chains, which I have extensive exposure in and like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and no. Mathematical economics and financial mathematics are such broad and overarching terms that it's hard to say that one will follow path A and the other will follow path B and the intersection will only occur here and here. Mathematical economics can be as diverse as using game theory and general equilibrium theory which has found application for topology and functional analysis. You can also end up doing econometrics which has a more statistical feel. Furthermore, it may also just mean an economist who translates economic theories into a mathematical framework or model.

Financial mathematics has a lot of stochastic calculus. It also tends to have partial differential equations, stochastic differential equations, numerical analysis, asymptotic analysis. It really depends on how you choose to approach financial mathematics. You can look at it as a mathematician and look at techniques and theories and determine when the solutions are valid and what conditions must hold. You can also approach this field from a more financial view point and consider arbitrage, option time values, and myriad of other pricing theories and thus build models reflecting those theories.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top