Math and Distance: How Far is Pluto from Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Pluto
AI Thread Summary
Pluto is approximately 2.7 billion miles from Earth, making a hypothetical non-stop flight at 400 mph take about 770 years. The discussion highlights the impressive achievements of astronomers in the 1930s who detected Pluto, emphasizing the contrast with today's funding challenges for space exploration. While advancements in technology have occurred, there is a perceived stagnation in manned space missions since the moon landing. The conversation also touches on the public's interest in space exploration, suggesting that profit motives overshadow scientific discovery. Overall, the thread reflects on the vast distances in our solar system and the need for continued investment in space research.
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
It's funny how simple math can help you visualize just how far away an object is.

Pluto is, at minimum, 2,700,000,000 (2.7 Billion) miles away from Earth.

Traveling at "airliner" speeds, say 400mph, a non-stop flight to Pluto would take:

6,750,000 hours en route, or...

281,250 days en route, or...

770 years en route!

I think it's pretty amazing, that in the 1930's, we were able to detect an object only 2/3 the size of our moon at this kind of distance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is indeed! People who made those type of advances were respected world wide and celebrated for their achievements.
Worryingly nowadays is the current lack of funding and support for advancements. In 1930 it would take weeks to get to the far reaches of the world. by 1969 man had reached the moon and commercial flights were more viable. In the last 39 years, even with all the advances in technology, we still rely on the same principles and haven't even been back to the moon in 35 years!
Back then, advancement was worth the money, now its more will it make me a profit or not :(
 
Not sure what the lunar landing has to do with the enormanous distances seperating the various bodies of the solar system. Of course these distances are tiny compared to galactic distances.

I guess instead of putting Hubble into orbit we should have made another trip to the moon. :rolleyes:
 
Sorry should have made it more clear :P Was more the point they were able to spot Pluto in the 1930's, big news then but something similar would get less news time that some celebrity wedding, and would have to cost less too. Ofc we should have Hubble, but we should be doing both but people don't want to know now unless there's a profit in it.
 
Last edited:
If the flight to Pluto was unmanned and no adjustments were possible once the launch button was pressed, what would you be aiming at and what would be the chances of success ?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top