MHB Math Game HELP: Solve Hard Task with Invariants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Hard
Mathick
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
HELP - math game

A positive whole number was written on the board. In each step we rub out the number $$n$$ (written on the board) and we write a new one. If number $$n$$ is even, then we write number $$\frac{n}{2}$$ on the board. If number $$n$$ is odd, then we choose one of the numbers: $$3n-1$$ or $$3n+1$$ and we write it down on the board. Decide, if after finite amount of steps, we can obtain the number 1 one the board (no matter which number was written on the board at the beginning).

Please help. I can't figure it out. I know that it can be connected to invariants.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Deveno said:
This is the Collatz conjecture. It is currently unsolved.

Yes, I found it but there is one extra variation. You can choose either $$3n+1$$ or $$3n-1$$. Doesn't it have an influence on the result?
 
If at some stage of the game you have an odd number $n$ then one of the numbers $3n\pm1$ will be a multiple of $4$. Choose that one. Then the next two steps will take you to the number $\dfrac{3n\pm1}4$, which is strictly smaller than $n$. This process of making numbers strictly smaller will inevitably bring you down to $1$ eventually.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top