Mathematica Mathematical Analysis of Literature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a story's "plot," defined as a series of events typically structured into sections like introduction, buildup, climax, and conclusion. It explores a mathematical perspective on plot, viewing it as a series of quantifiable points representing themes such as love or violence. The difference between adjacent points is likened to a derivative, suggesting that it reveals underlying themes. Participants express interest in analyzing stories using this method, questioning whether quantifying narratives diminishes their magic or enhances storytelling. The conversation touches on the challenges artists face in appreciating their work, the relevance of hermeneutics in textual analysis, and the limitations of current AI in understanding text meaning.
sinyud
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
1) The "plot" of a story... A series of events... Normally characterized by "intro", "buildup", "climax", and "conclusion", or whatever other arbitrary label one might fancy to attribute to a section of a piece of literatute...
2) Mathematically, the "plot" of a story is a series of points in some (albeit somewhat strange) space where concepts like love, violence, disgruntleness, etc... are quantified.
3) The difference between two chronologically adjacent points, or as physicist are won't to say: "the derivative with respect to time (though with respect to page might be better)", would represent an underlying theme of the story...
4) Any one want to analyze a story in this fashion and post the analysis? I'd like to find a good story, and see how different our analyses are ... Perhaps different results could be mapped to each other via some change of reference/basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why would you want to lose the magic by quantifying it?
 
bill nye scienceguy! said:
why would you want to lose the magic by quantifying it?
Probabbly so you could write a great story?
Perhaps this is the curse of artists, they cannot enjoy the beauty of their creation like another person would.
 
This sounds more like you want hermeneutics, even though it's most often used for relgious texts, it does provide a way to analyze textual material. I suppose you could apply numerical methods to it. But only humans can read text and derive symbology, for example. Current AI is very poor in "understanding" the meaning of text.

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top