Mathematical and physical concepts in nanoscience

AI Thread Summary
For a master's program in micro and nano technology, a solid understanding of college-level mathematics and physics is essential. Key physics concepts include the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and atomic physics, while mathematics should cover integrals, Fourier transforms, and ordinary and partial differential equations. Graduate courses typically focus on practical applications, such as characterization methods and crystal growth, rather than advanced theoretical concepts. While specific textbooks were not recommended, exploring articles in journals like Applied Physics Letters can provide insight into the mathematical and physical requirements for producing quality work in the field. This foundational knowledge is crucial for success in nanoscience, nanomaterials, and nano electronic design, leading to potential career opportunities in microelectronics.
WolfgangPaul
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am going to attend masters program in micro and nano technology. I would like to know what concepts of maths and physics I should be clear at and some good textbooks for the same. My study module includes nanoscience, nanomaterials and nano electronic design.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WolfgangPaul said:
I am going to attend masters program in micro and nano technology. I would like to know what concepts of maths and physics I should be clear at and some good textbooks for the same. My study module includes nanoscience, nanomaterials and nano electronic design.

I knew some people who had a college level of math and physics and earned a PhD in this discipline by producing a lot of data that came from following procedure - such as cleaning samples in HF, then processing them and doing simple averaging of results. Many times your advisor will already have in mind what you need to accomplish so no need to overthink things...

But if one would like to rise higher than a mere practitioner, the math/phys levels in this discipline (in a graduate school with more empirically minded faculty) are:

- physics: college level. B.Sc. is already too high. Understanding the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle or atomic physics is considered highly advanced in such disciplines. After all, they teach how to estimate packing/volume in unit cells in a crystal based on the volume of an atom which they consider dependent on its atomic number :smile: lol Most graduate courses you'll be through are at a practitioner's level - that is, procedures, methods and tools for characterization or crystal growth/deposition etc, cleaning of surfaces with sand blasting etc mundane things :smile:- math: College level with some chapters in Calculus - integrals, Fourier transforms, some ODEs and PDEs, functions extrema... nothing too fancy at all. You'll prob be required to pass 1-2 math courses at the graduate level, which I described above. Once you pass these, you might never use the knowledge if you work in a practitioner's lab (which is often the case in this field).

Books to prepare for this kind of math/phys level? I cannot suggest them, as I myself didn't dwell on that level much... But a suggestion: go to the website of Applied Physics Letters (which is in effect, largely a nanoscience/microelectronics journal :smile:) and check out the articles there. Many of them contain little math. (I'm sure some of them are highly mathematical) This will indicate the lowest levels of math / physics at which one can still produce highly regarded work in this field.

All the best in your studies. It can be an interesting field and land you a rewarding job in a microelectronics company.
 
Thanks a lot sunfire. I'll take a look at the applied physics letters.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top