Mathematica Mathematical Demonstration - Lenses in contact

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for the focal distance of two touching thin lenses, expressed as 1/fc = 1/f1 + 1/f2. The original poster is struggling with the mathematical demonstration and seeks assistance in understanding how to apply the lens equation for two lenses positioned closely together. A suggestion is made to consider the scenario where the distance between the lenses approaches zero, which simplifies the derivation. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly manipulating the equations, particularly in distributing terms properly, which ultimately leads to a clearer understanding of the relationship between the lenses. The exchange emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in a calculus-based physics context.
ToTalk
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have been working on this for a little while and think I am approaching it incorrectly. If someone can help, I'd really appreciate it. This is for a basic introductory calculus based Physics class that I am in.

1. Mathematically demonstrate the following equation with no numerical examples



2. \frac{1}{f_{c}} = \frac{1}{f_{1}} + \frac{1}{f_{2}} - This is the equation for the focal distance of two touching thin lenses.




3. I have tried using the lens equation for the first and second lens, and solving for a distance of zero between them, but i can't figure out how to solve for where the image from the first lens would be, and therefore how the second lens would act on it

Thanks Very Much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remove the slash before the 1 in the tex code. Try considering two lenses that are a distance d apart and having a look what happens. Wneh you have an equation for that see waht happens when d tends to zero.
 
Hi Kurdt,

Thanks for the info.

Are you talking about this:

\frac{f_2 (d - f_1) } { d - (f_1 +f_2) }


If so, I had seen that, but I am unsure of how to get to that from the given equation.

Thanks
 
I am referring to that equation. Now as I say if you let d tend to zero you will obtain the equation you are after. I trust you know how to get to the equation with d.
 
Just got it. For some reason I distributed d to both terms in the numerator instead of f_{2}.

Thanks for your help.
 
Back
Top