In the "proof" of the theorem, my course notes defines [itex]P_r(t)[/itex] as the probability to find the system is state r at time t, and it defined H as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); the mean valueof [itex]\ln P_r[/itex] over all acesible states:

[tex]H \equiv \sum_r P_r\ln P_r[/tex]

Is is right to call the above sum the "mean value of ln P_r" ?! Cause given a quantity u, the mean value of f(u) is defined as

[tex]\sum_i P(u_i)f(u_i)[/tex]

So the mean value of [itex]\ln P_r[/itex] should be

[tex]\sum_r P(P_r)\ln P_r[/tex]

But P(P_r) does not make sense.

I confessed my confusion to the professor in more vague terms (at the time, I only tought the equation looked suspicious), but he said there was nothing wrong with it. I say, H could be called at best "some kind" of mean value of ln(Pr).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mathematical detail regarding Boltzman's H thm

Loading...

Similar Threads for Mathematical detail regarding | Date |
---|---|

Best Mathematics / Physics software | Mar 15, 2017 |

Books on mathematical modeling | Feb 22, 2017 |

Language and Compiler built for Mathematics | Jul 8, 2016 |

Mathematica Is there any way to improve my skills with Mathematica software | Dec 28, 2015 |

Mathematica: Regarding ListPlot and Manipulate | Mar 7, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**