Mathematical help in understanding this integral (Dirac formulation)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhyAmateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Mathematical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Dirac delta function and its definition as a limit of a sequence of functions, specifically $$d_K(x) = \int_{-K/2}^{K/2} \frac{dk}{2\pi} e^{ikx}$$ as $$K \to \infty$$. It clarifies that a single sequence is insufficient for defining the Dirac delta; rather, a collection of sequences must be considered to understand its properties. The conversation highlights that Dirac delta functions are classified as generalized functions, which arise from the need to address non-uniform convergence and differentiate continuous but non-differentiable functions. The topic is complex and involves multiple spaces of generalized functions, necessitating further study in specialized literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms
  • Knowledge of generalized functions and distribution theory
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra and vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "generalized functions" and their applications in mathematical analysis
  • Study "distribution theory" to gain insights into the properties of Dirac delta functions
  • Explore the concept of Fourier transforms and their relationship with generalized functions
  • Investigate the implications of non-uniform convergence in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced calculus, particularly those studying the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function and generalized functions.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
I was studying Dirac delta function, when I ran across this statement:

The Dirac delta function is defined by: $$\delta(x) = lim _{K \to \infty } d_K(x), $$ where

$$ d_K(x) = \int_{-K/2}^{K/2} \frac{dk}{2\pi} e^{ikx}$$

I was thinking that as $$K\to \infty$$ the integral won't be defined. What's going on here?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is certainly not a definition. For a start if you want to define Dirac as sequences of functions you need to define a collection of such sequences, and then consider the common limit. One specific sequence is no where enough. What they are trying to say is that "the Dirac delta has Fourier transform equal to 1".

There is no function whose domain and co-domain are reals, and possessing the properties of Dirac delta. These functions are properly called generalized functions. They were discovered/invented because (1) the paradoxes that arose from limit passage of non-uniform convergence and (2) the desire to differentiate continuous but not differentiable functions. This means your definitions of derivative and integral fail when talking about them.

What makes this confusing is that there are multiple spaces of generalized functions. If you have done linear algebra, you would have done abstract vector spaces. You know there are lots of vectors spaces other than ##\mathbb{R}^n##, and the same thing happens here.

This is a very very very large topic, which of course they don't teach you. My recommendation is to go to your library and search for textbook specifically on "generalized functions" or "distribution theory".
 
Will do, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K