Mathematical Modelling, Vectors and Parametric Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around mathematical modeling, vectors, and parametric equations, with participants seeking assistance on individual problems related to these topics. The original poster expresses uncertainty in their reasoning and logic regarding their attempts at solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their reasoning for specific problems, questioning the validity of their approaches and assumptions. Some express confusion over the application of mathematical concepts, such as the relationship between variables and the interpretation of time intervals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the reasoning behind certain answers, indicating that while some approaches are deemed acceptable, others require more clarity. There is ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods, particularly regarding the understanding of time intervals and mathematical relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clearer reasoning in their attempts and highlight the importance of understanding the problem statements fully. There is mention of specific constraints regarding how time is defined in the context of the problems being discussed.

Nile Anderson
Messages
48
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Sorry to disappoint the math fanatics but no this is not a question that integrates all three topics at once but individual ones. I still need assistance though with the following more so in the reasoning behind them as I feel my logic is flawed.
https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t34.0-12/11350393_1080048282023208_1468717877_n.jpg?oh=42c6757af8f078a9a8f525051260bde9&oe=5576CB04
https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t34.0-12/11358829_1080048288689874_1045920915_n.jpg?oh=8a5bced9bb2de46109e19b8e50124969&oe=5575A90C
https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t34.0-12/10003237_1080048292023207_149145089_n.jpg?oh=d49bf300e8c582b94ef1b70a47c9c616&oe=5575A4F2

Homework Equations


There are not really any relevant equations but look at my solutions below.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am pretty sure these are wrong
22D
28C
42C
43B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please also state your reasoning behind your answers. Simply selecting on random does not really qualify as an attempt and it will be easier for everyone to see when/if you have the wrong idea.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nile Anderson
Orodruin said:
Please also state your reasoning behind your answers. Simply selecting on random does not really qualify as an attempt and it will be easier for everyone to see when/if you have the wrong idea.
Sorry my good sir,
22) To be completely honest , the approach to this one is fuzzy for me as I have only done two variables at a time before this but i thought that i could square the x and y to get that x2 + y2 = r2cos2θ and then adding z squared would produce x2 + y2 +z2 = r2cos2θ + r2sin2θ= r2, is this correct , is there no simpler approach if so
28) This one was even trickier I imagined that is they were perpendicular then their dot product = 0 , but things got hairy when r.s came up , as I only had so far (r-s)(2r+3s)=0, I said r=s for one solution so r.s must me rs which makes no sense when I repeat it now .
42) I found the first derivative and assumed where it was greater than zero , the graph was increasing
43) I said it was 10 years between 1990 and 2000 and so it was zero to ten.
 
Orodruin said:
Please also state your reasoning behind your answers. Simply selecting on random does not really qualify as an attempt and it will be easier for everyone to see when/if you have the wrong idea.
Is this not satisfactory ?
 
Your reasoning and answer for 22 and 42 are fine.
For 43, you are right, but your explanation is a bit vague. Note the exact statement of the start and end times.
For 28:
Nile Anderson said:
28) This one was even trickier I imagined that is they were perpendicular then their dot product = 0 , but things got hairy when r.s came up , as I only had so far (r-s)(2r+3s)=0.
Expand that and isolate r.s.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nile Anderson
haruspex said:
Your reasoning and answer for 22 and 42 are fine.
For 43, you are right, but your explanation is a bit vague. Note the exact statement of the start and end times.
For 28:

Expand that and isolate r.s.
Darn should have went with first instinct
(r-s)(2r+3s)=0
2r.r +3 s.r - 2s.r - 3s.s=0
2r2 + s.r -3s2=0
s.r= 3s2-2r2
Making A the answer, Thanks Mr. Haruspex Sir
About the integral one though, it was just basically an intuitive guess , I still don't understand why I would start at 0 and why end at 10 , why that would not work out to 11 years versus the 10 from 1990 to 1999 ( Because it is not the end of 2000), I am pretty clueless about that one, no intuition whatsoever
 
Exactly how many years are between Jan 1, 1990, and Jan 1, 2000? You are allowed to use decimals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nile Anderson
10 years , yes ok but why do we start at zero , is that a general rule ?
 
No, this must be chosen according to how the time t=0 was selected, but this is not explicitly stated in the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nile Anderson

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K