Mathematical notation outdated?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerenuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential for modernizing mathematical notation through graphical and colorful representations, particularly in the context of tensor contraction. Participants emphasize the need for a system that allows for easier visualization and manipulation of algebraic concepts, suggesting that existing tools like computer algebra systems could facilitate this transition. The conversation references Penrose's notation for tensors and highlights the importance of balancing clarity with backward compatibility. Overall, there is a consensus that while computers can enhance notation, traditional pen-and-paper methods remain prevalent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor contraction and its applications in mathematics.
  • Familiarity with Penrose's notation for tensors.
  • Basic knowledge of computer algebra systems and their functionalities.
  • Awareness of category theory concepts, particularly as discussed by John Baez.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in graphical mathematical notation systems.
  • Explore the functionalities of computer algebra systems like Mathematica or Maple.
  • Investigate the implications of Penrose's notation on teaching and learning algebra.
  • Study John Baez's writings on monoidal categories and their relevance to tensor arithmetic.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, software developers in educational technology, and anyone interested in the evolution of mathematical notation and its impact on learning and comprehension.

Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
Now as we have computers, why don't we introduce a nice graphical and colourful notation that would make formulas much more understandable? And I mean revamp all of it - not just fancy writing. Tensor contraction for example are ideal candidates for visualisation. It would be much easier to do algebra in the head. Of course some clever hotkeys for typing in this notation would be needed, but at the same time a computer algebra system could check transformations.

One drawback is of course that one always need a computer, but they are everywhere.

I have some ideas for such a system.
Are some ideas out there already?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How would you write down such notation? Whilst computers are used to type things up, mathematics is still done by pen and paper! What if you wanted to print off and read a paper but only had a black and white printer?
 
It is inevitable that the standard curriculum will be modernized to account for the ability of computers to do tedious symbolic manipulation, so that students have more time to focus on the mathematical subtleties that require human undersanding.

On the otherhand I can't think of anyway that computers could significantly improve notation.
 
You might be interested in the paper:
Mathematical Notation: Past and Future (2000). Stephen Wolfram October 20, 2000.
 
cristo said:
How would you write down such notation? Whilst computers are used to type things up, mathematics is still done by pen and paper! What if you wanted to print off and read a paper but only had a black and white printer?
Yes, mathematics is still done by pen and paper since there is no easy program to handle notation. Colour or not is another question. But I would sacrifice backwards-compability for new-age clearness.
 
Hurkyl said:
Yes, that was actually one example I was thinking of. But also I thought of some more cartoonish drawing of basic school algebra to would be more visual to pupils. With colours or blobs or so :)
 
There's some deep sense in which tensors are "two-dimensional" arithmetic (John Baez talks about it a lot -- look for stuff he writes on monoidal categories, adjunctions, and on category theory in general). Roughly speaking, it involves arithmetic on vector spaces which is compatable with the arithmetic on vectors in a certain way. Anyways, that's the reason why string diagrams work so well for dealing with tensors. In general, I think it would be unlikely to have such a natural higher-dimensional notation for doing arithmetic in various algebraic strctures.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K