Mathematical notation to multiply matrix elements

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the need for mathematical notation to perform componentwise multiplication of two matrices, A and B, resulting in matrix C. The Hadamard product is identified as the appropriate operation, where C_i,j = A_i,j * B_i,j. There is confusion regarding whether this can be computed using common operators like the dot product, which yields a scalar rather than a matrix. The user is seeking a more efficient method for calculating power requirements in a Mathcad assignment, similar to how it is done in Matlab with element-wise multiplication. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding matrix operations for practical applications in calculations.
DyslexicHobo
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I need to figure out the mathematical notation to multiply matricies A and B = C so that...

If matrix A is...
a1
a2
a3
a4
a5

and matrix B is...
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5

so that matric C is...
a1*b1
a2*b2
a3*b3
a4*b4
a5*b5

Would this involve using a the transverse of a matrix?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks like the componentwise multiplication of vectors to me.
 
That is, the dot product of two vectors.
 
When I calculate the doct product of those two matricies, won't I get a single scalar value?
 
Okay, I found what I was looking for. It's called a Hadamard product. The Hadamard product A and B produces matrix C so that C_i,j = A_i,j * B_i,j.

Is there any way to compute this using common mathematical operators (such as inverse, transpose, dot product, cross product)?

The reason I ask is because I'm doing a homework assignment in Mathcad calculating power requirements of a car at certain speeds. I'm just assigning the speeds to a single-column matrix and the resistant forces to a single-column matrix. I want to output a power matrix.

If I can't figure it out, I'll just have to manually assign a force and velocity variable to each speed, but there must be a way to do this more easily.
 
I don't know what Mathcad is, but in Matlab you would write this sort of multiplication as .* instead of just *. (That last period just ends the sentence of course).
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K