- 573
- 676
mattt said:Below definition 1.6
Thanks! Fixed now.
The forum discussion centers on the challenges of rendering LaTeX in the context of the "Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Geometry" series. Users reported issues with non-rendered LaTeX in specific definitions and examples, particularly in Definition 1.7 and Example 1.8. Solutions were proposed, including the correct usage of "rlap" and "llap" instead of "mathrlap" and "mathllap" to resolve rendering problems. Additionally, suggestions were made for providing PDF versions of the articles to enhance readability and accessibility.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and educators involved in quantum field theory, as well as web developers and technical authors looking to improve LaTeX rendering and document accessibility.
mattt said:Below definition 1.6
Heh, great to hear. Maybe one day you can explain it in simpler terms to the rest of us rubes.mattt said:By the way Urs, I am just starting to review this fantastic series of yours on mathematically rigorous Relativistic Perturbative Quantum Field Theory, and I think it is one of the best things that has happened on physicsforums in a long time,