Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Geometry - Comments

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around technical issues related to the rendering of LaTeX in the "Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Geometry" post on Physics Forums. Users reported problems with non-rendered LaTeX in specific definitions and examples, leading to discussions about potential typos and rendering hacks. Solutions were proposed, including the correct usage of "rlap" and "llap" for rendering, and suggestions for providing PDF versions of the articles for better readability. The community expressed a desire for a more user-friendly format for printing and accessing the material, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the content within Physics Forums for community benefit. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and collaborative efforts in presenting complex mathematical content online.
  • #31
mattt said:
Below definition 1.6

Thanks! Fixed now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
By the way Urs, I am just starting to review this fantastic series of yours on mathematically rigorous Relativistic Perturbative Quantum Field Theory, and I think it is one of the best things that has happened on physicsforums in a long time, so thank you dearly for that! ( and keep them coming! )
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and Urs Schreiber
  • #33
mattt said:
By the way Urs, I am just starting to review this fantastic series of yours on mathematically rigorous Relativistic Perturbative Quantum Field Theory, and I think it is one of the best things that has happened on physicsforums in a long time,
Heh, great to hear. Maybe one day you can explain it in simpler terms to the rest of us rubes. :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K