Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Geometry - Comments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges of rendering LaTeX in the context of the "Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Geometry" series. Users reported issues with non-rendered LaTeX in specific definitions and examples, particularly in Definition 1.7 and Example 1.8. Solutions were proposed, including the correct usage of "rlap" and "llap" instead of "mathrlap" and "mathllap" to resolve rendering problems. Additionally, suggestions were made for providing PDF versions of the articles to enhance readability and accessibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with LaTeX typesetting
  • Understanding of mathematical notation in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of HTML and web rendering issues
  • Experience with document conversion tools, particularly from LaTeX to PDF
NEXT STEPS
  • Research LaTeX rendering techniques for web applications
  • Explore tools for converting LaTeX documents to PDF format
  • Learn about the use of "rlap" and "llap" in LaTeX for positioning
  • Investigate best practices for creating print-friendly web content
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and educators involved in quantum field theory, as well as web developers and technical authors looking to improve LaTeX rendering and document accessibility.

  • #31
mattt said:
Below definition 1.6

Thanks! Fixed now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
By the way Urs, I am just starting to review this fantastic series of yours on mathematically rigorous Relativistic Perturbative Quantum Field Theory, and I think it is one of the best things that has happened on physicsforums in a long time, so thank you dearly for that! ( and keep them coming! )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and Urs Schreiber
  • #33
mattt said:
By the way Urs, I am just starting to review this fantastic series of yours on mathematically rigorous Relativistic Perturbative Quantum Field Theory, and I think it is one of the best things that has happened on physicsforums in a long time,
Heh, great to hear. Maybe one day you can explain it in simpler terms to the rest of us rubes. :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K