MATLAB: Verification of Superposition Principle

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the Superposition Principle in a MATLAB simulation involving a 100V DC source and a 50V AC source with three resistances. The user attempts to measure the current through a 15-ohm resistor by short-circuiting each voltage source separately but finds discrepancies in the results, particularly a 94.4V measurement when short-circuiting the DC source. Suggestions include adjusting the step-size for accurate RMS voltage values and using an RMS block to better represent the combined AC and DC current outputs. The final output reflects the RMS value of the combined currents, which can be verified using established formulas for AC signals with DC offsets. The conversation highlights the challenges in circuit analysis and the importance of proper measurement techniques in simulations.
Bloopy
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Verify Superposition Principle using Matlab, given a DC source of 100V, an AC source of 50V, 60Hz and three resistances, R1=10 ohms, R2=20 ohms and R3=15 ohms.

I created the circuit below and ran the program. Result:

1.JPG


Homework Equations



None, just running the program.

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, the Principle of Superposition states the total current in any part of a linear circuit equals the algebraic sum of the currents produced by each source separately. I am trying to verify the current flowing through R3 = 15 ohms resistance.

  1. I short circuit the DC voltage source and run the program. Result:

    2.JPG
  2. I then short circuit the AC voltage source and run the program. Result:

    3.JPG


    As clearly can be seen, the Superposition Principle is not verified. I am unable to reason where the discrepancy is.
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    18.2 KB · Views: 1,407
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    19.1 KB · Views: 1,128
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    16.5 KB · Views: 1,111
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not the best with circuits, but I don't understand your result when you short-circuit the DC source. How can you measure 94.4 V in that circuit?
 
DrClaude said:
I'm not the best with circuits, but I don't understand your result when you short-circuit the DC source. How can you measure 94.4 V in that circuit?
Yeah, I altered the step-size to get the accurate value of RMS voltage. Edited the question.
 
Bloopy said:
I created the circuit below and ran the program. Result:

1-jpg.jpg

The Current Measurement block is processing a current waveform with both AC and DC components. The block outputs the instantaneous current Not sure how this block will represent a static value of an AC current. What happens if you use an RMS block right before Display3?
 

Attachments

  • 1-jpg.jpg
    1-jpg.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 763
lewando said:
The Current Measurement block is processing a current waveform with both AC and DC components. The block outputs the instantaneous current Not sure how this block will represent a static value of an AC current. What happens if you use an RMS block right before Display3?
Capture.JPG


Sorry for the delayed replies, I am in college for 12-14 hours during the day.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    18.3 KB · Views: 859
So what is now displayed is the RMS value of the combined AC and DC currents. You should be able to verify this result by using your single-source results and a googleable formula for determining the RMS value of an AC signal with a DC offset.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K