Matrices Formula for 10 by 10 Matrices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BionicBiceps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Matrices
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quest for a determinant formula for 10 by 10 matrices in variable format. Participants explore the complexity of such a formula, the challenges involved in deriving it, and alternative methods for calculating determinants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a determinant formula for any 10x10 matrix, expressing a need for a general expression.
  • Another participant emphasizes the complexity of deriving such a formula, noting it would involve 100 variables and be very lengthy.
  • A specific example of a determinant for a 5x5 matrix is provided, illustrating the complexity of the formula.
  • Some participants question the necessity of the formula and suggest that the request may stem from academic pressure.
  • There is mention of the potential for using computer programs to simplify the calculation, although this may still involve complex methods.
  • One participant estimates that a derived formula for a 10x10 matrix would consist of 10! terms, leading to an impractical length if printed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity and impracticality of deriving a determinant formula for a 10x10 matrix, but there is no consensus on the best approach to take or the necessity of the formula itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of deriving a general formula for large matrices, including the sheer volume of terms involved and the potential for computational methods to handle the calculations more efficiently.

BionicBiceps
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a determinant formula for a 10 by 10 matrices in variable format.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK. Why do you want to know this? Do you have a specific example? This is going to be rough if the matrix isn't of a very simple type. For example, if it was sparse, it might be easier to figure out. Any general formula is going to involve 100 variables and is going to be an incredible mess and is going to be VERY VERY LONG. Basically, the first step is going to be finding the determinants of 10 9x9 matrices. This will be tough.

So, can you post a specific matrix for which you want the det?
 
I just need the basic formula for any 10x10 matrices
 
BionicBiceps said:
I just need the basic formula for any 10x10 matrices

Yeah, I got that, but what I'm saying is that the "basic formula" is incredibly complicated. It will involve 100 variables. Surely you can see why that will be a mess. That, combined with the fact that the first step will be to find the det of 10 9x9 matricies. It will be long and will take up many pages.

Here is the det of a 5x5 matrix (with the first row being a,b,c,d,e and so on)

a g m s y-a g m t x-a g n r y+a g n t w+a g o r x-a g o s w-a h l s y+a h l t x+a h n q y-a h n t v-a h o q x+a h o s v+a i l r y-a i l t w-a i m q y+a i m t v+a i o q w-a i o r v-a j l r x+a j l s w+a j m q x-a j m s v-a j n q w+a j n r v-b f m s y+b f m t x+b f n r y-b f n t w-b f o r x+b f o s w+b h k s y-b h k t x-b h n p y+b h n t u+b h o p x-b h o s u-b i k r y+b i k t w+b i m p y-b i m t u-b i o p w+b i o r u+b j k r x-b j k s w-b j m p x+b j m s u+b j n p w-b j n r u+c f l s y-c f l t x-c f n q y+c f n t v+c f o q x-c f o s v-c g k s y+c g k t x+c g n p y-c g n t u-c g o p x+c g o s u+c i k q y-c i k t v-c i l p y+c i l t u+c i o p v-c i o q u-c j k q x+c j k s v+c j l p x-c j l s u-c j n p v+c j n q u-d f l r y+d f l t w+d f m q y-d f m t v-d f o q w+d f o r v+d g k r y-d g k t w-d g m p y+d g m t u+d g o p w-d g o r u-d h k q y+d h k t v+d h l p y-d h l t u-d h o p v+d h o q u+d j k q w-d j k r v-d j l p w+d j l r u+d j m p v-d j m q u+e f l r x-e f l s w-e f m q x+e f m s v+e f n q w-e f n r v-e g k r x+e g k s w+e g m p x-e g m s u-e g n p w+e g n r u+e h k q x-e h k s v-e h l p x+e h l s u+e h n p v-e h n q u-e i k q w+e i k r v+e i l p w-e i l r u-e i m p v+e i m q u
 
Is there a simpler method then row reduction for solving this?
 
Not that I am aware of. But, I ask again, WHY do you need to know this? Let me guess, your Diff. Eq. prof promised you an A if you could give him a formula for the det of a 10x10 matrix. Is that right?
 
Robert1986 said:
Not that I am aware of. But, I ask again, WHY do you need to know this? Let me guess, your Diff. Eq. prof promised you an A if you could give him a formula for the det of a 10x10 matrix. Is that right?

haha that's exactly why
 
And now you can see why he told you this.
 
There has to be an easier way through a computer program.
 
  • #10
BionicBiceps said:
There has to be an easier way through a computer program.

Well, sure, but that is probably going to involve either the method I mentioned or some sort of numerical method. The only reason it is 'easier' is because the computer can do it much faster than you can (though doing a 10x10 matrix will probably take a REALLY long time.)
 
  • #11
A formula of the form that Robert1986 has already given you for a 5x5 matrix, if derived for a 10x10 matrix, will consist of 10! = 3,628,800 terms, with each term a product of 10 variables. If printed out with 10 terms per line, 50 lines per page, it will take over 7000 pages; that's several reams of paper! :cry:
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K