Undergrad Matrix Elements via Feynman Diagrams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Feynman diagrams to estimate matrix elements for decay processes, specifically in the context of Fermi's Golden Rule. The rho 0 meson decay is analyzed, highlighting the importance of considering both uubar and ddbar components of the wavefunction. Key points include the interaction strength and vertex factor of (-1/3) for d quarks, the necessity of adding complex amplitudes for processes leading to the same final state, and the treatment of cross terms in matrix element calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their role in particle physics
  • Familiarity with matrix elements and Fermi's Golden Rule
  • Knowledge of quark charge assignments and their implications in decay processes
  • Basic grasp of complex amplitudes and their addition in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Fermi's Golden Rule in particle decay
  • Explore advanced examples of Feynman diagrams for various decay processes
  • Learn about the significance of vertex factors in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of complex amplitudes in interference effects in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying decay processes and Feynman diagrams in advanced physics courses.

Sum Guy
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I am currently trying to understand how we can use feynman diagrams to estimate the matrix element of a process to be used in fermi's golden rule so that we can estimate decay rates. I am trying to learn by going through solved examples, but I am struggling to follow the logic of the solutions provided.

For instance consider the question;
2v01vdd.jpg

The feynman diagram for one possible method of decay is shown for the rho 0 meson:
2i91roj.jpg

And the following solution is provided:
iohxxj.jpg


I have a few questions arising from this solution. We are told to consider that the decay can proceed from either the uubar or ddbar part of the wavefunction, but should we not also consider that the photon vertex can sit on u or ubar (and hence introduce a factor of 2 to the matrix element - I know this is not important when considering ratios, but is this still correct?)

Why is the strength of the interaction and the vertex factor given by (-1/3) in the case of d quarks, not (+1/3)? In general I thought that when considering vertex factors we should take the magnitude of the charge of the particle involved, otherwise could we not have a factor of (-1/3) from the photon emitted from the down quark and a factor of (+1/3) from the photon emitted from the anti down quark, which would then cancel?

If we are trying to estimate the rate of decay of a given process, and that process can occur by multiple methods, why do they then have a cancelling out effect? Surely these should all contribute to the rate of decay! e.g. should the first matrix element not be ~ 2/3 + 1/3?

Why can we ignore the cross terms <uubar|q|ddbar>?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sum Guy said:
Why is the strength of the interaction and the vertex factor given by (-1/3) in the case of d quarks, not (+1/3)? In general I thought that when considering vertex factors we should take the magnitude of the charge of the particle involved, otherwise could we not have a factor of (-1/3) from the photon emitted from the down quark and a factor of (+1/3) from the photon emitted from the anti down quark, which would then cancel?
You add complex amplitudes if multiple processes lead to the same final state. For the ##\rho## decay to pion plus photon, both processes (decay as uu and decay as dd) have the same complex phase and add up, for the ##\omega## decay they have opposite sign and subtract. For the decay "to a photon" (to ee), you have the opposite case.

You can only add magnitudes of (squared) amplitudes if the processes lead to different final states.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K