A Matrix transmission coefficient

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
I'm working in a paper, in which the transmission coefficient ##\hat t_k## is written in a matrix form.
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1.
The problem is that the transmission coefficient in the case I'm working on is in matrix form,it is not a number.
The Hamiltonian of the system I'm working on is in the form :
##\hat H=\dfrac{p^2}{2m}-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}+V(z)+\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}##
There is translational symmetry in the x-y plane.
##\vec{\mathbf{p}}## is the two dimensional momentum in the x,y plane.
##-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}## is the kinetic energy in the z direction.
##\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}## is the spin orbit coupling correction term.
##V(z)=V\theta(z)##

The solution of this problem may be solved to be:

##\vec{\varphi_{k\sigma}}(z)=
\begin{cases}
(e^{ikz}+\hat r_ke^{-ikz})\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z < 0 \\
\hat t_ke^{ik'z}\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z> 0
\end{cases} ##

according to the paper##\hat r_k## and ##\hat t_k## are the matrix reflection and transmission coefficients respectively.

Where ##\hat r_k=r_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat r} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##
and ## \hat t_k=t_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat t} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##

and ##\vec{\sigma}## is the vector of pauli matrices.

##\mathbf{\hat r}##and ##\mathbf{\hat t}## are spin flip operators.

as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?and how I can use it physically?
you can check the paper in the attachment file(second section).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
amjad-sh said:
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1. [...]
as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?
You can still form ##t_kt_k^*##, using the conjugate transpose for the adjoint. It is Hermitian positive definite, hence its eigenvalues are real. The condition is now that all eigenvalues must be less than 1.
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top