Matrix transmission coefficient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian of a quantum system characterized by translational symmetry in the x-y plane and includes a spin-orbit coupling correction term. The matrix forms of the reflection and transmission coefficients, denoted as ##\hat r_k## and ##\hat t_k##, are derived from the wave function solutions for regions z < 0 and z > 0. The participants confirm that the transmission coefficient can be generalized to matrix form and emphasize the importance of calculating ##t_k t_k^*##, which must yield eigenvalues less than 1 to satisfy physical constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Hamiltonians and wave functions.
  • Familiarity with spin-orbit coupling and its implications in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, including Hermitian matrices and eigenvalue calculations.
  • Proficiency in using Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, focusing on spin-orbit coupling.
  • Study the properties of Hermitian matrices and their significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Research the physical implications of transmission and reflection coefficients in quantum scattering.
  • Learn about eigenvalue problems in quantum mechanics and their applications to stability analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in condensed matter physics, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics who are interested in the implications of matrix forms of transmission coefficients and their physical interpretations.

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
I'm working in a paper, in which the transmission coefficient ##\hat t_k## is written in a matrix form.
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1.
The problem is that the transmission coefficient in the case I'm working on is in matrix form,it is not a number.
The Hamiltonian of the system I'm working on is in the form :
##\hat H=\dfrac{p^2}{2m}-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}+V(z)+\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}##
There is translational symmetry in the x-y plane.
##\vec{\mathbf{p}}## is the two dimensional momentum in the x,y plane.
##-\dfrac{\partial_z^2}{2m}## is the kinetic energy in the z direction.
##\gamma V'(z)(\hat z \times \vec{\mathbf p})\cdot \vec{\sigma}## is the spin orbit coupling correction term.
##V(z)=V\theta(z)##

The solution of this problem may be solved to be:

##\vec{\varphi_{k\sigma}}(z)=
\begin{cases}
(e^{ikz}+\hat r_ke^{-ikz})\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z < 0 \\
\hat t_ke^{ik'z}\chi_{\sigma} & \text{if } z> 0
\end{cases} ##

according to the paper##\hat r_k## and ##\hat t_k## are the matrix reflection and transmission coefficients respectively.

Where ##\hat r_k=r_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat r} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##
and ## \hat t_k=t_0\sigma_0 +\mathbf{\hat t} \cdot \vec{\sigma}##

and ##\vec{\sigma}## is the vector of pauli matrices.

##\mathbf{\hat r}##and ##\mathbf{\hat t}## are spin flip operators.

as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?and how I can use it physically?
you can check the paper in the attachment file(second section).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
amjad-sh said:
To check out if my work is right, I want to calculate ##t_kt_k^*##. It must be less than 1. [...]
as you can see the transmission and reflection coefficients are in matrix form.
so what I should do in this case? can we generalize the transmission coefficient to be in matrix form?
You can still form ##t_kt_k^*##, using the conjugate transpose for the adjoint. It is Hermitian positive definite, hence its eigenvalues are real. The condition is now that all eigenvalues must be less than 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K