Matrix with fractions for indices?

AI Thread Summary
Matrices can indeed have fractional indices, as they are simply a representation of operations on vector components. The discussion highlights that the presence of fractional values like -3/2, -1/2, 1/2, and 3/2 does not invalidate the use of matrices. Concerns about fractional indices may stem from the perception that matrices represent discrete operators, while they can also represent continuous ones. The equation provided may need clarification, particularly regarding its completeness and the nature of the eigenvalue representation. Overall, fractional indices in matrices are valid and can be utilized effectively in quantum mechanics contexts.
Shawnyboy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi PF Peeps!

Something came up while I was studying for my QM1 class. Basically we want to represent operators as matrices and in one case the matrix element is defined by the formula :

<m'|m> = \frac{h}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{15}{4} - m(m+1)} \delta_{m',m+1}

But the thing is we know m takes on the fractional values -3/2, -1/2, 1/2, 3/2. So basically my question is simply put: can you have a matrix with fractions for indeces?

Thanks,
Shawn
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes you can. A matrix is essentially just a compact way of specifying what action to perform on each component of a vector to make another vector, and can contain whatever you want. Is there something you've seen or heard that made you think fractional indices weren't possible?
 
Maybe it is because your matrix represents a continuous operator hence having continuous indices ?
 
I think your equation is not complete. If this is an eigenvalues equation then the diagonal matrix must have elements like:
$$ \sqrt{\frac{15}{4}-i(i+1)} $$where i the correspond to matrix column/row element by the same index on m values.
See also
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top