Matter/energy in 'empty' space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tsunami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Empty Space
Tsunami
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I read somewhere the dictum that 'nothing can be done without at least a material base' ; the way the term matter was employed in this text implied that vacuum, 'empty' space, was to be viewed as matter-less.

This would mean that in empty space, nothing at all can be done. This leads to an important question:

Can empty space be made into matter/energy? And vice versa?

In other words, can something occur like :

A + vacuum -> B + C , where the matter/energy of B and C does not equate with that of A.


The vice versa is even more important: is there a way in which matter/energy 'deteriorates' and becomes something like empty space? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thats a weird statement that I've never heard and certainly you don't get something for nothing as per laws of dynamics, but on a tangent there is something called zero point energy. This is basically the idea that even a vacuum has a sort of ground state energy, and if you believe stargate science you can use it via a little yellow thing :)
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top