Max Aphelion Distance of Kuiper Belt Comet w/216 yr Orbital Period

  • Thread starter Thread starter bri7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The maximum possible aphelion distance for a Kuiper Belt comet with a 216-year orbital period is calculated to be 42 AU, based on a minimum perihelion of 30 AU. The semi-major axis is determined to be 36 AU, leading to this maximum aphelion when considering the orbit's constraints. The discussion highlights that a comet's classification as a Kuiper Belt object depends on its origin rather than its perihelion distance. Additionally, the orbit's characteristics suggest that while it may have a defined period, it may not always complete an orbit due to its proximity to the Sun. This indicates that the nature of periodic comets involves complexities beyond simple orbital calculations.
bri7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find maximum possible aphelion distance for a Kuiper Belt comet with an orbital period of 216 years?
What is the eccentricity of this orbit?
What prevents a periodic comet from following this precise orbit?

Homework Equations


perihelion = a(1-e)
aphelion = a(1+e)
2a = perihelion + aphelion
P^2=a^3

The Attempt at a Solution


P^2=a^3
(216)^2 = a^3
a = 36 AU (semi major axis)

From here, I'm not sure where to go because I don't know the eccentricity, perihelion or aphelion distance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the semi-major axis (I think correctly), and you are asked to find the maximum possible aphelion. What does maximum possible aphelion mean in terms of the perihelion? Is there a minimum possible perihelion that the object can have and still be a Kuiper belt object?
 
phyzguy said:
You've calculated the semi-major axis (I think correctly), and you are asked to find the maximum possible aphelion. What does maximum possible aphelion mean in terms of the perihelion? Is there a minimum possible perihelion that the object can have and still be a Kuiper belt object?
Okay so since the aphelion is the point where the comet is furthest form the Sun, the max aphelion is 71.99 AU, and then I can calculate the eccentricity of the orbit
 
bri7 said:
Okay so since the aphelion is the point where the comet is furthest form the Sun, the max aphelion is 71.99 AU, and then I can calculate the eccentricity of the orbit

How did you come up with the 71.99 AU number?
 
phyzguy said:
How did you come up with the 71.99 AU number?
The major axis is 72 au and the max distance that the comet can be from the Sun is some number very close to 72, such that the orbit goes very close to the Sun at perihelon and very far away at aphelion
71.99 was just something I picked
 
If it grazes the sun at perihelion, would it be considered a Kuiper belt object?
 
phyzguy said:
If it grazes the sun at perihelion, would it be considered a Kuiper belt object?
No, I suppose it wouldn't
 
Is the definition of a Kuiper Belt object that it lies between 40 and 50 AU from the Sun?
 
Please don't solve problems for others, that's against forum rules you agreed to when registering. Instead prod them in the right direction.
Here are my thoughts:
The inner edge of the Kuiper Belt is 30 AU, outer edge is 50 AU. Hence, the closest the comet's orbit can get to the Sun is 30 AU. This is our perihelion, because in order to maintain that the semi major axis is 36, and we want the maximum possible aphelion, we calculate with the minimum possible perihelion.

So, we use the equation; semi major axis = (aphelion + perihelion)/2, giving us
36= (A+30)/2
A=42
The max possible aphelion is 42 AU.
 
  • #10
Emi11 said:
Here are my thoughts:
The inner edge of the Kuiper Belt is 30 AU, outer edge is 50 AU. Hence, the closest the comet's orbit can get to the Sun is 30 AU. This is our perihelion, because in order to maintain that the semi major axis is 36, and we want the maximum possible aphelion, we calculate with the minimum possible perihelion.

So, we use the equation; semi major axis = (aphelion + perihelion)/2, giving us
36= (A+30)/2
A=42
The max possible aphelion is 42 AU.
Thanks, this makes sense :)
I am still wondering why this is not a valid orbit for a periodic comet
 
  • #11
Hmmm, well a short-period comet must have an orbit of 200 years, so perhaps the eccentricity should be lower in order for it to be a valid orbit for a short period comet? However, this doesn't tangibly prevent the comet from following this orbit so I am unsure.
 
  • #12
Sorry for the late reply, but I just noticed this thread. I don't often browse here.

bri7 said:
I am still wondering why this is not a valid orbit for a periodic comet

I think that's a clue that there's no restriction on the minimum perihelion distance for a comet. A comet is an object that passes through the inner solar system where it can be warmed by proximity to the Sun and rendered visible in our night sky. I believe that the designation of the comet as a "Kuiper Belt comet" refers to its place of origin, it being an object perturbed from the Kuiper belt. The aphelion of a periodic comet is a good indication of its origin distance.

So your initial line of though regarding the orbit intersecting the Sun looks valid to me. Look up "degenerate ellipse" or "radial trajectory".

Just because an orbit has a period it doesn't mean it will every have a chance to complete one :smile:
 
Back
Top