Max Area of Rectangle on f(x)=-2/3x+4

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the maximum area of a rectangle with one side on the line of a given linear function. The participants discuss various methods and equations for finding the area, including using a parameter to adjust the quantities and using similar triangles. They also discuss the importance of considering the endpoints and observing the behavior of the function. Ultimately, they find the maximum area to be 6 and discuss different approaches for solving the problem.
  • #1
amcavoy
665
0
You have a linear function [tex]f(x)=-\frac{2}{3}x+4[/tex] where [tex]0\leq x\leq 6[/tex] and [tex]0\leq y\leq 4[/tex]. What is the maximum area of a rectangle that has one side on the line of the function?

I know how to optimize this, I am just having trouble finding the equation for area of such a rectangle in terms of the function.

I have included an image of what I am talking about. Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Prematurely posted... Fixing.
 
  • #3
What you need to do is to get express all the pertinent quantities in terms of a single parameter that can be adjusted. For example consider the starting point of writing equation of the line containing the parallel side as (a - 2/3 x).

In terms of parameter "a" the other quanitities you're interested in are :

y intercept of parallel side, yi = a

x intercept of parallel side, xi = 1.5a,

Length of parallel side, L = a sqrt(3.25)

Length of perpendicular side Lp = 3(4-a) / sqrt(13)

Area, A = 3/2 * a (4-a)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I don't really get where you got the length of the perpendicular side, but then again, I'm rushing to get to class... I had another way to solve the problem, but it was taking forever to write out that silly latex code stuff.
 
  • #5
http://students.washington.edu/marusich/trianglemax.jpg

[tex]\mbox{Note that the area of the rectangle is zero when } x = 0 \mbox{ and when } x = 6 \mbox{. Also, just by looking, we see that the area ought to increase, then}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{eventually hit a maximum and decrease, on the } x \mbox{-interval } [0, 6] \mbox{. This sort of thing is useful to observe before getting started, because it either}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{helps confirm what we calculate or makes us stop and think when we see something strange (like if we calculated that one of the endpoints}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{were the maximum). Anyway...}[/tex]


[tex]\mbox{A} = ab[/tex]



[tex]\cos\theta = \frac{x}{a}[/tex]

[tex]a = \frac{x}{\cos\theta}[/tex]



[tex]\sin\theta = \frac{b}{6-x}[/tex]

[tex]b = (6-x)\sin\theta[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{A} = ab = \frac{x}{\cos\theta}(6-x)\sin\theta[/tex]

[tex] = x(6-x)\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta} = x(6-x)\tan\theta[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{but}[/tex]



[tex]\tan\theta = \frac{4}{6} = \frac{2}{3}[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{so we just have:}[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{A}(x) = \frac{2}{3}x(6-x) = 4x-\frac{2}{3}x^2[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{A'}(x) = 4-\frac{4}{3}x[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{A}(x) \mbox{ has a max or min either at the endpoints of the } x \mbox{-interval } [0, 6] \mbox{ or when A'}(x) = 0 \mbox{ (or at any other critical point, but since this function is just}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{a parabola, it has no asymptotes, kinks, jumps, holes or anything like that). The max should definitely not occur at the endpoints in this}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{case (remember our initial observation), or we've done something wrong.}[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{A'}(x) = 4-\frac{4}{3}x = 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{4}{3}x = 4[/tex]

[tex]x = 3[/tex]



[tex]\mbox{if }x > 3 \mbox{ then A'}(x) < 0[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{verify: A'}(10000000000) = 4 - \frac{4}{3}(10000000000)<0[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{if }x < 3 \mbox{ then A'}(x) > 0[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{verify: A'}(0) = 4-\frac{4}{3}(0) = 4 > 0[/tex]


http://students.washington.edu/marusich/derivative.jpg


[tex]\mbox{So A}(x) \mbox{ has a global maximum at } x = 3 \mbox{. The endpoints of our particular interval } [0, 6] \mbox{ will not be maxima because A}(x) \mbox{ is increasing}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{for all } x < 3 \mbox{ and decreasing for all } x > 3 \mbox{, which means that A}(3) > \mbox{A}(x) \mbox{ for all }x \neq 3 \mbox{. You could verify this by simply comparing}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{A}(0) \mbox{ and A}(6) \mbox{ to A}(3) \mbox{.}[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{So the maximum area is:}[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{ A}(3) = 4(3)-\frac{2}{3}(3)^2 = 6[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{ (Still another reason this result makes sense is because the point }(3, 6) \mbox{ lies in quadrant I, which makes sense because A}(x)\mbox{ was an inverted}[/tex]
[tex]\mbox{parabola with its maximum obviously somewhere in quandrant I.) }[/tex]

Converted to latex. It's the first time I've used it. Hurray for easier-to-read math! Oh, and looking back, I guess you only wanted the relation for the rectanglular area...Oh well. Here's the whole thing. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Night Owl said:
I don't really get where you got the length of the perpendicular side ...

From similar triangles. I'm too lazy to draw a diagram so just refer to Alex's original thumbnail and look at the small right-angle triangle in the upper left hand coner of the figure. The hypotemus of this triangle is (4-a) and one of the other sides is the perpendicular distance. Further this small triangle is similar to the largest triangle in the figure which gives the ratio of these two sides as 3/sqrt(13).
 
Last edited:
  • #7
I see how you got it, now. For future reference, it's usually easier to follow if you show your steps and not just the end result...even if it seems like a simple thing to you.

Anyway, your way also works, and it gives the same result for the area. It's always nice to see another way to do a problem.
 
  • #8
Night Owl said:
For future reference, it's usually easier to follow if you show your steps and not just the end result...even if it seems like a simple thing to you.

You know that questions like this one are quite often someones homework or assignment. It's ok to give them some pointers on the route to follow without giving them every detail.
 
  • #9
There is a easier way to solve this problem

My english is poor,but I guess you can understand my idea easily.
Firstly,we let g(x)=-(2/3)x+h be our one line of rectangular
when g(x)=0,x=(3/2)h;
when x=0,g(x)=h;
so the two other line of rectangular are p1(x)=(3/2)x+h and p2(x)=(3/2)x-(9/4)h;
let (3/2)x+h=(-2/3)x+4 and (3/2)x-(9/4)h=(-2/3)x+4,you will get the information of other two vertexs,so all four vertexs are only concerned with "h".you can draw a fuction of area S(h) and find its maximum area easily.

I guess I must learn to say something mathmatical in english.
 

Related to Max Area of Rectangle on f(x)=-2/3x+4

What is the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4?

The maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 is infinite since the graph extends infinitely in both the x and y directions. However, if we are looking for the maximum area of a rectangle within a specific domain, we can use calculus to find the optimal dimensions of the rectangle.

How do you find the dimensions of the rectangle with maximum area on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4?

To find the dimensions of the rectangle with maximum area on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4, we can use the derivative of the function to find the critical points. Then, we can use the second derivative test to determine if these points correspond to a maximum or minimum. Finally, we can plug these values into the area formula for a rectangle (A=lw) to find the optimal dimensions.

Can the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 ever be negative?

No, the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 cannot be negative. This is because area is always a positive value, representing the amount of space occupied by a shape. Therefore, the maximum area of a rectangle on f(x)=-2/3x+4 can only be zero or a positive value.

Is there a specific domain where the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 occurs?

Yes, the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 occurs within a specific domain, which can be determined using calculus. This domain will depend on the specific bounds of the x and y axes, as well as the shape and direction of the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4.

What other factors can affect the maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4?

The maximum area of a rectangle on the graph of f(x)=-2/3x+4 can also be affected by the slope of the graph, the position of the rectangle on the graph, and the constraints of the problem. For example, if there is a specific perimeter or area that the rectangle must have, this will impact the maximum area that can be achieved.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
960
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
403
Replies
2
Views
195
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top