Max Space Velocity: Reach Limit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical limits of spacecraft velocity, specifically the concept that the maximum velocity approaches the speed of light (c) but cannot reach it. As a spacecraft accelerates, its effective mass increases, requiring exponentially more force to continue accelerating. Consequently, even with a powerful engine, as the spacecraft nears c, the acceleration diminishes toward zero. The type of propulsion system, such as ion thrusters, plays a crucial role in determining the spacecraft's ability to achieve high velocities. Ultimately, while theoretical limits exist, practical constraints significantly impact actual acceleration and velocity.
mpekatsoula
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok.. first of all excuse my English (not my native).

I had a conversation with a friend and we were thinking.. We have a spacecraft or something like that. Let's tell that it has a lot of fuel and we are moving with a = x m/s^2, where a is acceleration and x a value (we don't care how big or small). What is the MAX velocity that we will go with? Theoretically v-->c (no abrasion with something wright?), but obviously that's not possible. What is going to make our spacecraft move with a max velocity and what's that value?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The max theoretical velocity you can obtain is very close to c, the closer you get to c the larger force you will need to obtain your acceleration. Let's say that you want to maintain constant your acceleration to x m/s^2 then the real problem is that (not taking in account any feasibility of it)
a = F/M where F is the force applied and M is your mass
but the faster you go the larger is your mass that means that the faster you go the larger the force you need to apply to your spacecraft to accelerate.
What will happen, considering that you have engine powerful enough, is that the closer you get to c the smaller your acceleration will be (going to the limit at 0)
Regarding what is going to make your spacecraft moving, that depends on the engine you have.
You can have normal thrust, but probably they will fail to accelerate you beyond a certain point, you can have ion thrusters or any other propulsion system you can imagine. There are many type of hypothetical engine that go from ion thrusters (see on wikipedia how they work) I suggest you to give a look to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft_propulsion
 
Thanks AGADOTTI! obvious i can tell but i couldn't think that this was the reason! thanks for the link also
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top