Max weight that anyone can lift using over head pulley.

AI Thread Summary
A 50 kg man cannot lift a 70 kg man using an overhead pulley unless he is clamped to the ground, as his own weight limits the force he can exert. If the lighter man pulls harder than 70 kg, both will leave the ground, but he must climb the rope faster than the heavier man is lifted to maintain that position. If he stops climbing, the tension will drop, causing the heavier man to fall. The discussion concludes that, under frictionless conditions, the maximum load one can lift on the other side of the pulley is less than their own weight, regardless of arm strength. Therefore, clamping the lighter man is essential for successfully lifting the heavier man.
bazzoo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can a man whose weight is 50KG (but powerful arms) lift another man with 70 KG weight using an overhead pulley.

I guess no since the light man is not clamped to the groud, his arm strength will not bear any significance and he can lift only the wieght(on other side of the pulley) equal to his own weight. Please comment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the light man pulled harder than 70 kg, both men would leave the ground at the same time, but the only way to keep both men off the ground would be for the light man to keep pulling harder than 70kg and climb up the rope faster (and higher) than the heavy man was lifted.

If the light man stopped climbing, the tension in the rope would reduce to below 70kg and the heavy man would fall back to the ground.

If the light man pulled with between 50kg and 70kg, he would climb the rope and the heavy man would not move.

If there is no friction at the pulley, it doesn't make any difference which man pulls on the rope, provided the tension in the rope is greater than 70 kg.
 
Thanks for the reply..So effectively the man pulling the rope (50 KG) cannot lift the heavier man (70KG). He can just climb the rope at his side. If he doesn't the rope may snap at max due to tension but in no way can the heavy man come above ground.

Hence Can it be assumed that the maximum load anyone can lift on other side of pulley(frictionless) should be less than his own weight despite his powerful arms.


Only way to Lift the heavy man would be to clamp the lighter man to ground somehow and then he can utilize his powerful arms to exert more that 70 KG pull.

Please comment ..
 
bazzoo said:
Please comment ..

That's not what I said. Read it more carefully.
 
bazzoo said:
Thanks for the reply..So effectively the man pulling the rope (50 KG) cannot lift the heavier man (70KG). He can just climb the rope at his side. If he doesn't the rope may snap at max due to tension but in no way can the heavy man come above ground.

If he climbs fast enough, he can lift the heavier guy, as AlephZero said. It's a question of acceleration: if he accelerates up the rope, he can exert a downwards force on it that is greater than his own weight. In this case both men rise, the lighter one faster than the heavier one. So the lighter guy will get to the pulley first.

Hence Can it be assumed that the maximum load anyone can lift on other side of pulley(frictionless) should be less than his own weight despite his powerful arms.

If he wants to keep his feet on the ground, yes. Otherwise see above.

Only way to Lift the heavy man would be to clamp the lighter man to ground somehow and then he can utilize his powerful arms to exert more that 70 KG pull.

That'll work.
 
AlephZero & Michael C ...Thanks a ton..I think this clarifies my doubts. :)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top