Max Work From Heat Engine Reservoirs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the maximum work extractable from a heat engine operating between an infinite heat reservoir at temperature Th and a finite cold reservoir with initial temperature Tc0 and heat capacity C. The participants explore the relationships between heat transfers (Qh and Qc) and their dependence on temperature changes, leading to the formulation of work done (dw) as a function of these variables. The final expression for work extracted is W = C(Th ln(Th) - Th) - C(Th ln(Tc0) - Tc0), which highlights the relationship between heat input and heat deposited into the cold reservoir. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the infinite heat reservoir's implications on the problem. Ultimately, the problem is resolved with a clearer understanding of the underlying thermodynamic principles.
SevenTacos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have an infinite heat reservoir with temperature Th. But you’ve only got a finite cool reservoir, with initial temperature Tc0 and heat capacity C. Find an expression for the maximum work you can extract if you operate an engine between these two reservoirs.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been stumped at this for hours. I know I simply need to integrate work as dW= dQc + dQh. So i need to define Qc and Qh. Qc = (Cc)(dTc) and Qh= (Ch)(dTh) correct? I am completely at a loss on defining dTc and dTh however. I'm essentially confused because Tc depends on how much energy (q) the engine has deposited into the cold resevoir. When I try to create an equation, I come up with: Tc= Tc0 + (Qc)(C) But to define q, you need Tc. How do you define these variables when they rely on each other? Please Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tc is going to be changing, while Th will be staying the same. So as Tc rises, a smaller fraction of the heat transferred from Th is able to be converted to work. If Tc and Th are the instantaneous values of the temperatures, and dq is transferred to Tc, what is the amount of heat dQ transferred from Th (in terms of Tc, Th, and dq)? How much work dw is done? What is the change in Tc, dTc? What is dw/dTc?

Chet
 
I appreciate the reply, but I'm still pretty confused. Using the statement dQh/dQc = Th / Tc, it's clear dQc = (Tc / Th) dQh. I can't really think of anywhere else to go though. I know I can define Qh and Qc in terms of nRTln(v1/v2) but those are the wrong variables here.
 
SevenTacos said:
I appreciate the reply, but I'm still pretty confused. Using the statement dQh/dQc = Th / Tc, it's clear dQc = (Tc / Th) dQh. I can't really think of anywhere else to go though. I know I can define Qh and Qc in terms of nRTln(v1/v2) but those are the wrong variables here.
This is good so far. dw = dQ-dq, so what do you get for that?

Chet
 
You would get dw = dQh- dQh(Tc / Th). But I still need to define Tc as a function of Th correct? It's 1 am here, will return in the morning!
 
SevenTacos said:
You would get dw = dQh- dQh(Tc / Th). But I still need to define Tc as a function of Th correct? It's 1 am here, will return in the morning!
If I take your results, and express dw in terms of dQc, I get:
$$dw=\left(\frac{T_{h0}}{T_c}-1\right)dQ_c$$
Now how is dQc related to the heat capacity C and dTc?
If you substitute this into the equation for dw, what do you get?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
If I take your results, and express dw in terms of dQc, I get:
$$dw=\left(\frac{T_{h0}}{T_c}-1\right)dQ_c$$
Now how is dQc related to the heat capacity C and dTc?
If you substitute this into the equation for dw, what do you get?

Chet
dQc = (C)(dTc), so dw = (Tho/Tc -1) (C)( dTc)

Did some more thought on this: If dQh/dQc = Th / Tc, then (Ch)(dTh)/(Cc)(dTc) = Th / Tc. If this is correct then you can cross multiply and take the integral, looking like Cc/Ch ∫ dTc/ Tc = ∫ dTh / Th. The bounds for the first integral should be Tc to Th, because the engine will stop when Tc = Th. The bounds for the second I guess would be Tho to Th? After integration you get (Cc/Ch) ln (Th/ Tc) = ln (Th/Tho), rearranging you get this final factor for Tc:

Tc = Th / (( Th/ Tho) ^ (Ch/Cc))

I feel like this should be right, but it also feels horribly wrong
 
SevenTacos said:
dQc = (C)(dTc), so dw = (Tho/Tc -1) (C)( dTc)

This last equation is correct, and it's all you need to finish solving this problem.

Did some more thought on this: If dQh/dQc = Th / Tc, then (Ch)(dTh)/(Cc)(dTc) = Th / Tc. If this is correct then you can cross multiply and take the integral, looking like Cc/Ch ∫ dTc/ Tc = ∫ dTh / Th. The bounds for the first integral should be Tc to Th, because the engine will stop when Tc = Th. The bounds for the second I guess would be Tho to Th? After integration you get (Cc/Ch) ln (Th/ Tc) = ln (Th/Tho), rearranging you get this final factor for Tc:

Tc = Th / (( Th/ Tho) ^ (Ch/Cc))

I feel like this should be right, but it also feels horribly wrong

Yes. It's horribly wrong. Here's what's wrong:

The problem statement says that you have an infinite heat reservoir at temperature Th. That means that Ch is infinite, and that Th never changes from its initial value Th0. So the rest of the analysis is incorrect.

Getting back to your correct equation for dw, you have:

$$dw=C\left(\frac{T_{h0}}{T_C}-1\right)dT_C$$

This can be integrated immediately from ##T_C=T_{C0}## to ##T_C=T_{h0}## to give you w. Do you know how to integrate this?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
This last equation is correct, and it's all you need to finish solving this problem.

Getting back to your correct equation for dw, you have:

$$dw=C\left(\frac{T_{h0}}{T_C}-1\right)dT_C$$

This can be integrated immediately from ##T_C=T_{C0}## to ##T_C=T_{h0}## to give you w. Do you know how to integrate this?

Chet

Yes, the integral comes out to W = C ( Th ln (Tc) - Tc ) which yields a work of C (Th ln (Th) - Th) - C (Th ln(Tco) -Tco )

So W = C (Th ln (Th) - Th) - C (Th ln(Tco) -Tco ) as a final answer?
 
  • #10
SevenTacos said:
Yes, the integral comes out to W = C ( Th ln (Tc) - Tc ) which yields a work of C (Th ln (Th) - Th) - C (Th ln(Tco) -Tco )

So W = C (Th ln (Th) - Th) - C (Th ln(Tco) -Tco ) as a final answer?
Yes. This is an acceptable final answer to your homework problem. However, consider what happens if we manipulate your final answer mathematically into the following equivalent form:
$$W=CT_h\ln \left(\frac{T_h}{T_{co}}\right)-C(T_h-T_{co})$$
Can you show that this equation is mathematically equivalent to your answer? Can you identify what the second term on the right hand side of this equation represents physically? With that realization, what does the first term on the right hand side represent physically?

Chet
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Yes. This is an acceptable final answer to your homework problem. However, consider what happens if we manipulate your final answer mathematically into the following equivalent form:
$$W=CT_h\ln \left(\frac{T_h}{T_{co}}\right)-C(T_h-T_{co})$$
Can you show that this equation is mathematically equivalent to your answer? Can you identify what the second term on the right hand side of this equation represents physically? With that realization, what does the first term on the right hand side represent physically?

Chet
The two terms represent the heat put into the system Qh, and the heat deposited into the cold reservoir Qc respectively, after all, W = Qh - Qc.
And yes, I understand the algebra to clean up that equation.

Just have to say Thank you Chet, this problem was much easier than I made it out to be; I severely overthought this. Thanks for taking the time to put me through the process I needed to go through
 
  • #12
SevenTacos said:
The two terms represent the heat put into the system Qh, and the heat deposited into the cold reservoir Qc respectively, after all, W = Qh - Qc.
And yes, I understand the algebra to clean up that equation.

Just have to say Thank you Chet, this problem was much easier than I made it out to be; I severely overthought this. Thanks for taking the time to put me through the process I needed to go through
My pleasure. It's great to work with someone as focused and determined as you are.

Chet
 
Back
Top