Maximizing Compound Interest: Comparing Weekly and Quarterly Payments

  • Thread starter Thread starter pbonnie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    annuity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on maximizing compound interest by comparing weekly and quarterly payment schemes. Participants clarify that while more compounding periods generally yield better returns, the key is understanding how to apply the formula correctly, particularly distinguishing between the number of payments and compounding periods. The conversation emphasizes that the problem can be approached qualitatively, focusing on the benefits of weekly compounding over quarterly. Additionally, a mathematical comparison of interest earned on a $1 investment over a year using both methods is suggested for a clearer demonstration of the advantages. Ultimately, the consensus is that weekly compounding is more beneficial than quarterly compounding.
pbonnie
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question is attached.


Homework Equations


sn = [a(1-r^n)]/(1-r)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know the more compounding periods there are, the better. The part that I'm stuck on is what values to put for r and n, since the rate that he is making payments is different from the number of compounding periods. When I use this equation, (using 1 year of payments for example), I'm getting a confusing answer. I used 12 for n, since there are 12 payments being made in 1 year, but I think that's the problem? Since n is supposed to be the number of compounding periods. But then how do I show that there are 12 payments being made?
 

Attachments

  • math.png
    math.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
pbonnie said:

Homework Statement


Question is attached.


Homework Equations


sn = [a(1-r^n)]/(1-r)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know the more compounding periods there are, the better. The part that I'm stuck on is what values to put for r and n, since the rate that he is making payments is different from the number of compounding periods. When I use this equation, (using 1 year of payments for example), I'm getting a confusing answer. I used 12 for n, since there are 12 payments being made in 1 year, but I think that's the problem? Since n is supposed to be the number of compounding periods. But then how do I show that there are 12 payments being made?
You can't put anything for r, since the interest rate is not given. All you need to do is say whether Harold benefits from the interest calculation being done quarterly vs. being done weekly. To justify your decision, you can ignore the fact that he is putting money in his account monthly, and just compare the two interest schemes: quarterly vs. weekly.
 
you can work out the change in the equation, due to compounding weekly, while depositing monthly (by carefully thinking about what happens over the course of each month). But as Mark44 says, the question seems to just want a qualitative answer. i.e. a reasonable explanation for why he is better off.
 
Oh okay great, thank you both. I was trying to use the equation as a hypothetical situation to show that weekly compounding is better but I guess since it didn't give any other value it's only looking for a word answer.
Thank you :)
 
Actually, you can do better by showing mathematically that he earns more interest when it's computed weekly vs. quarterly. Just compare the interest earned on $1 for a year with the two methods.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top