Maximizing Efficiency: Water-Cooling Methods for a Refreshing Glass of Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter jenny tales
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on investigating the most efficient methods to cool a glass of water, comparing refrigeration and freezing with the addition of liquid coolants like antifreeze, distilled water, and mineral oils. It highlights the distinction between efficiency and speed, noting that passive cooling allows water to reach room temperature without adding heat to the environment. While active cooling methods can be fast, such as using liquid nitrogen, they may not be energy-efficient due to the energy required to liquify nitrogen. The conversation emphasizes the need for specificity in defining the cooling method's goals, whether for efficiency or speed. Ultimately, the most efficient method is often passive cooling, while faster methods may compromise energy efficiency.
jenny tales
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
im doing an investigation into what is the most efficient way to cool a glass of water. so far i am looking at:
-Refrigeration/ Freezing
-Adding liquid coolants:
-Antifreeze
-Distilled water
-mineral oils

any more ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Efficient or fast? They are not the same thing. And you'll need to be more specific about what you are going to do. Ie, the most efficient way to cool a glass of water from boiling to room temp in a room is by letting it cool on its own: you add no additional heat to the room, as you would if you used any sort of active cooling.
 
Yeah... for fast, I'd consider dropping it into a vat of liquid nitrogen. Given the energy expended in order to liquify the nitrogen in the first place, however, it's hardly efficient.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top