Maximizing Engine Power: The Benefits of Using a Trailer for Moving Heavy Loads

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdrinker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trailer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of engine power requirements for two vehicles: one weighing 2000 pounds and the other weighing 1000 pounds with an additional 1000-pound trailer. Participants explore the implications of weight distribution, axle count, and associated resistances on engine performance when moving heavy loads.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions which vehicle requires more engine power to move, considering weight distribution and the effect of additional axles on required force.
  • Another participant argues that adding a trailer increases mass, wind resistance, axle resistance, and friction, thereby increasing the work required from the engine.
  • A different participant asserts that a 2000-pound vehicle is more efficient in terms of power compared to a 1000-pound vehicle with a trailer, citing practical design considerations.
  • One participant shifts the focus to the number of axles, suggesting that a vehicle with more axles may experience less force per contact patch, potentially reducing rubber hysteresis, though the impact on overall rolling resistance remains uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of trailer weight and axle count on engine power requirements. There is no consensus on which configuration is definitively better or more efficient.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various factors such as mass, resistance, and axle configuration without resolving the complexities of how these factors interact in different scenarios.

jdrinker99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I have the following 2 vehicles:

Vehicle 1: Weighs 2000 pounds
Vehicle 2: Weighs 1000 pounds with a 1000 pound trailer

Which requires more engine power to move? Does the weight distrubution on the additonal axles of the trailer decrease the required force needed to move the vehicle?

A free christmas tree is riding on this (no pun intended). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skip the tree.

If you just add a trailer to the vehicle it adds mass, wind resistance, axle resistance and friction to turn the wheels. No matter how small you can engineer those resistances to be, if you add mass to the weight the engine must pull, you added work.

So: If you have a 1000 lb trailer to pull a 200 lb tree, you added 1200lb of work to the engine. If you strap the tee to the the truck you added 200lb of work to the engine.

You do the math...lol
 
Last edited:
A 2000lb. vehicle will definitely be more efficient power-wise than a 1000lb. vehicle with a 1000lb. trailer for all sorts of practical reasons.

1000lb. vehicles are hard-pressed to pull double their weight, whereas a 2000lb. vehicle is designed to efficiently pull 2000lb.
 
I think the original post is more about the number of axles. Assume two vehicles with the same mass, one with 2 axles, and one with 4 axles. Which one has more rotational friction?

One advantage of a 4 axle system is less force per contact patch on each tire, which should reduce the overall amount of rubber hysteresis. I'm not sure what it does for the overall rolling resistance.

Since the doubled up axles are in-line, there shouldn't be much difference in aerodynamic drag.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
25K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K