Maximizing Launch Distance for a Penny Shooter

  • Thread starter Thread starter PoofyHair
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on building a penny shooter, with the main challenge being how to effectively accelerate the penny without using a large compressor. Suggestions include utilizing a compressed spring for propulsion, although safety concerns are noted. The idea of using CO2 cartridges as an alternative to achieve greater launch distances is also proposed. Participants express curiosity about the potential launch distance achievable with a spring mechanism. Overall, the conversation emphasizes exploring safe and practical methods for maximizing the launch distance of a penny shooter.
PoofyHair
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

First of all, I highly doubt this is in the correct forum so move it if necessary. I've been at this forum for a while although I never really bothered to post anything. The other day however, I decided that I wanted to build a penny shooter, or a gun that shoots penny's into maybe watermelons or items of that nature. The problem is that I am having trouble finding ways to accelerate the penny. A compressor would be too big, so my guess is that pressure is out of the deal. Any ideas from you guys?

-PoofyHair
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using a compressed spring, and see how much effective it is. It can be dangerous, though.
 
Compressor? What about using CO2 cartridges?
 
How far do you think a spring would launch it?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top