Maximizing Learning: The Importance of Solution Manuals in Mathematical Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter med17k
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Learning mathematical physics independently can be challenging, particularly due to the lack of solution manuals for exercises in many textbooks. The discussion highlights the difficulty in verifying answers, especially when problems involve proving equalities. While some textbooks, like "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, offer student solution manuals that provide solutions for about half of the problems, others, such as Arfken's book, do not include any solutions. This lack of resources can hinder self-study, leading to questions about the necessity of having a solution manual to ensure correct understanding and problem-solving.
med17k
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi , I'm learning mathematical Physics on my own .but there is a problem that there are no solutions presented for the exercises in the textbooks so how to make sure I found the correct answers? . a lot of problems however requires proving an equality for example but some problems may be hard to solve.Is it essential to have a solution manual for the problems ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
med17k said:
Hi , I'm learning mathematical Physics on my own .but there is a problem that there are no solutions presented for the exercises in the textbooks so how to make sure I found the correct answers? . a lot of problems however requires proving an equality for example but some problems may be hard to solve.Is it essential to have a solution manual for the problems ?

There should be textbooks with solutions for half of the problems. Have you looked for some of them?
 
I have mathematical methods for physics and engineering by arfken but it doesn't have any solution to any problems .
 
I believe "mathematical methods for physics and engineering" by Riley has a student solutions manual with half the problems completed
 
med17k said:
I have mathematical methods for physics and engineering by arfken but it doesn't have any solution to any problems .

I think this is one of the typical complaints I see of the text. There is no solutions available for that text as far as I know.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Back
Top