Maximizing Profit Per Hour: A Day Trader's Strategy to Maximize Income

  • Thread starter Thread starter RogerPN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per
AI Thread Summary
A stock day trader aims to maximize his hourly income by quitting after reaching a 2-point profit, as he typically achieves this 90% of the time within a 5-hour trading day. This strategy contrasts with maximizing total profit, as he focuses on the likelihood of earning less than 2 points. The discussion highlights that to optimize average profit per hour, he should stop trading when the marginal profit from an additional hour equals his average profit. The trader's uncertainty about future profits complicates the decision, as he relies on probabilities rather than guaranteed outcomes. Ultimately, the effectiveness of his plan in maximizing profit per hour remains uncertain.
RogerPN
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A stock day trader has a winning system and he wants to maximize his profit per hour. He has found that when he trades 5 hours a day, 90% of the time he will make 2 points profit or less and 10% of the time he will make more than 2 points profit. He knows that to earn the maximum total amount of profit he will have to trade 5 hours per day, but rather than maximizing his total profit, he wants to make the maximum hourly income.

To do this he plans to trade each day until he hits 2 points in profit, then he quits. His reasoning is that since he is less likely to make more than 2 points a day, he will maximize his return per hour by stopping as soon as he hits his 2 points.

Will his plan work to gain the maximum profit per hour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A stock day trader has a winning system and he wants to maximize his profit per hour. He has found that when he trades 5 hours a day, 90% of the time he will make 2 points profit or less and 10% of the time he will make more than 2 points profit. He knows that to earn the maximum total amount of profit he will have to trade 5 hours per day, but rather than maximizing his total profit, he wants to make the maximum hourly income.

To do this he plans to trade each day until he hits 2 points in profit, then he quits. His reasoning is that since he is less likely to make more than 2 points a day, he will maximize his return per hour by stopping as soon as he hits his 2 points.

Will his plan work to gain the maximum profit per hour?

Since he is maximizing average (per hour) profit, he should stop when marginal profit (from an extra hour) just equals his average profit, which is 2/(hours worked).
 
EnumaElish said:
Since he is maximizing average (per hour) profit, he should stop when marginal profit (from an extra hour) just equals his average profit, which is 2/(hours worked).
He never knows for sure what profit, if any will be produced in the next hour, or any hour. All he knows are the probabilities as stated in the original question.
 
You should derive an equivalent relation in terms of expected profit.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top