Maximum Speed - T-shaped intersection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a traffic stop for running a stop sign at a T-shaped intersection, where the angle between the roads is approximately 83 degrees. The driver, unfamiliar with the stop sign, reflects on the maximum speed possible for making a safe right turn without skidding or crashing into a guardrail. It is suggested that due to the short length of the road and the need for caution, most drivers would likely need to stop or yield significantly before turning. The conversation also touches on the physics of turning, including frictional force and centripetal force calculations to determine safe speeds. Overall, the focus is on understanding the dynamics of navigating this specific intersection safely.
VernonMLeon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A couple of months ago I was pulled over by a police officer for running a stop sign. The officer claimed I "plowed right through" the stop sign. I honestly had no idea what he was talking about but wasn't about to argue with a cop. I realized after going back to check the intersection after being pulled over that he was referring to a stop sign that is at a "T-shaped" intersection where the stop is right before you turn from the one lane stem of the T to the upper right extremity of the T which is also a narrow road and the angle between the two roads was probably more like 80-85 degrees making it not a "true" T. I do not consciously remember the stop sign at all, but I believe that I stopped (I have never gotten a traffic ticket prior to this). Also, beyond the "top" of the T was a guardrail overlooking a small ditch. On top of that the stem of the "T", the road I was turning from was only about 0.3 miles in length after having come from another road. I was driving a mid-sized sedan. Basically I am wondering what's the maximum speed you could go from a 0.3 mile road that is about twice the width of a mid-sized sedan at a T-shaped intersection to make a right turn onto another road which is about the same width and where the angle between the two roads would be about 83 degrees without skidding or crashing through the guard rail that is on the far side of the intersection.

I presume that it's not very fast especially given the short amount of time to build up speed and in all likelihood for your average driver such as myself who knows no special driving tricks, you would have to stop or do a heavy yield to even make the turn.

The ticket situation is all over, I'm just personally curious now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frictional force F=uN
u=frictional coefficient tangent of the angle at which the material on the substance starts to slide . N= normal force (mass)*(g)
F=mv^2/r centripetal force , m=mass of car , v= speed , r=radius of curve
you can calculate the force at which the rubber tires would start to slide on pavement you could look up this coefficient or do and experiment , then you can calculate the speed of the turn. . I hope this helps that’s about all I could think of.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top