Maxwell 3D & Icepak thermal simulation for a air coil

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around thermal simulations of an air coil using Maxwell 3D and Icepak, specifically focusing on temperature rises under different current loads and frequencies. Participants explore the implications of using different simulation types (Eddy Current vs. DC) and seek advice on discrepancies in temperature results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports a temperature rise of about 75°C when loading 1.6A current with an adaptive frequency of 800 MHz, which exceeds the expected rise of less than 15°C.
  • Another participant observes a 6°C temperature rise using a DC solution type and a 3°C rise using an Eddy Current solution type with a very low frequency, expressing confusion over the differing results.
  • A third participant suggests testing even lower frequencies (e.g., 10-20 Hz) and higher frequencies (e.g., 1 Hz) to see their effects on temperature rise.
  • One participant advises against combining electromagnetic and thermal simulations for air coils due to poor conductive heat transfer in air, emphasizing that convection and radiation are the primary modes of heat transfer.
  • Concerns are raised about the chaotic nature of convection and the impact of mesh sizes on simulation accuracy, suggesting that these factors could contribute to variability in results.
  • Another participant explains that the input current for Eddy Current simulations should be the peak value, indicating that using a direct current value without adjustment could lead to differing loss calculations and temperature rises.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of using Eddy Current versus DC simulations, and there is no consensus on the best approach to take for accurate thermal simulation results. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the reasons for the observed discrepancies in temperature rises.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions made in the simulations, the dependence on definitions of current types, and the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps involved in the thermal modeling.

Melon
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I am doing a Maxwell 3D&Icepak thermal simulation for a air coil. I want to get its temperature when loading 1.6A current. So I use Eddy Current type in Maxwell 3D and Temperature and Flow type in Icepak. Then I load 1.6A solid current and adaptive frequency of 800 MHz for the coil. But I get the result as about 75cel. The ambient temperature is 20cel and its temperature rise should be less than 15cel according to its specifications. Do you have any advice for this situation? Thanks!
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/g6RM6MalHlzsytHHDC9X0B
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/L3ThZQPUC3poVuCN3SXpHn
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/tIMGP90aQsfrkCzQNTQgmE
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Guys,
I am doing a air coil thermal simulation by Maxwell 3D&Icepak to verify its rated cueernt. First I use Maxwell 3D DC solution type to load DC current and get about 6cel temperature rise in Icepak. But then I want to try this in Maxwell 3D Eddy Current solution type, so I load stranded current with adaptive frequency of 1e-08Hz (which I think is similar to DC current). But I get about 3cel temperature rise in Icepak this time. That is confused for me. I wonder why the temperature rise is different. Could you help raise some advice for this situation? Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Hi, though I am not expert on this and I have no experience of the software packages you mention, still want to ask some things:
What do you get if you try even lower frequency , something like ##10^{-20}Hz##
What do you get if you try much higher frequency, something like ##1Hz##.
 
Melon said:
Hi Guys,
I am doing a air coil thermal simulation by Maxwell 3D&Icepak to verify its rated cueernt. First I use Maxwell 3D DC solution type to load DC current and get about 6cel temperature rise in Icepak. But then I want to try this in Maxwell 3D Eddy Current solution type, so I load stranded current with adaptive frequency of 1e-08Hz (which I think is similar to DC current). But I get about 3cel temperature rise in Icepak this time. That is confused for me. I wonder why the temperature rise is different. Could you help raise some advice for this situation? Thanks!
Honestly I wouldn't bother combining EM + Thermal for an air coil. Why? Because the conductive heat transfer of air of so starkly poor.

Also "what frequency DC?" - 1 Hz could be sufficient to be DC; it's "on a spectrum" anyway. For microwave equipment, 50 MHz is "sufficiently DC"! Do a back of the envelope given your calculated inductance of the coil and it's inductive reactance compared to the power source Norton resistance: being within a factor of 10x is already pretty much DC; 100x is easily DC.

The only heat transfer that matters with air at "normal temperatures" is convection and radiation. And very quickly (~300C-500C) radiation dominates. Radiation is far simpler and if it's dominating, it's all you need to worry about.

Convection is highly dependent on the aerodynamics of air flow and odds are a lot of your variability is due to errors in parameters affecting convection which can be chaotic as Navier-Stokes can be chaotic (i.e. laminar vs. turbulent plus dependencies on geometry, gravity, etc.). So it's easy to get variable answers. Also your mesh sizes can create as much error. Always focus on your mesh with FEA.

You can use a hand calculations based on standard pre-defined heat transfer geometries (cubes, cylinders, spheres, slabs, etc.) and get a good answer faster from simply known the IR losses given the coil current levels you are using.

Eddy currents presume and are relevant only for large slabs of coil conductor or core. If you are using wire, there are no eddy currents in the coils and being air there are no eddy currents induced by the coil. If you have really large steel cores that aren't laminated or really large slab coil conductors, sure there will be eddy currents, but even the latter you should be designing the coil/conductors to avoid eddy currents (see how Bitter magnets suppress eddy currents).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Melon and Delta2
The difference between DC solvers like Magnetostatic and Eddy Current is that with Eddy current you need to input the peak value of current. So for example, a Magnetostatic with 1A current input is NOT same as Eddy Current Simulation with 1A current input. For you to have equivalent conditions Eddy current needs to be loaded with 1*sqrt(2) value of current to imitate same condition as in Magnetostatic (or other DC solvers).

If you see the losses here, it will be differing by twice if same value of current is used in these two different type of solvers. This could be leading to different temperature rise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K