Maxwell 3D & Icepak thermal simulation for a air coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on thermal simulation of an air coil using Maxwell 3D and Icepak, specifically addressing discrepancies in temperature rise when using different current types and frequencies. The user reports a temperature rise of 75°C with 1.6A current, exceeding the specified limit, and seeks advice on this issue. Suggestions include considering the poor conductive heat transfer of air and the impact of convection and radiation on temperature results. Additionally, the importance of using appropriate current values for different simulation types is emphasized, as using peak values in Eddy Current simulations can lead to significant differences in calculated losses and temperature rise. The conversation highlights the complexity of thermal simulations and the need for careful parameter selection and mesh considerations.
Melon
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I am doing a Maxwell 3D&Icepak thermal simulation for a air coil. I want to get its temperature when loading 1.6A current. So I use Eddy Current type in Maxwell 3D and Temperature and Flow type in Icepak. Then I load 1.6A solid current and adaptive frequency of 800 MHz for the coil. But I get the result as about 75cel. The ambient temperature is 20cel and its temperature rise should be less than 15cel according to its specifications. Do you have any advice for this situation? Thanks!
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/g6RM6MalHlzsytHHDC9X0B
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/L3ThZQPUC3poVuCN3SXpHn
https://jam8.sapjam.com/embedded_images/show/tIMGP90aQsfrkCzQNTQgmE
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Guys,
I am doing a air coil thermal simulation by Maxwell 3D&Icepak to verify its rated cueernt. First I use Maxwell 3D DC solution type to load DC current and get about 6cel temperature rise in Icepak. But then I want to try this in Maxwell 3D Eddy Current solution type, so I load stranded current with adaptive frequency of 1e-08Hz (which I think is similar to DC current). But I get about 3cel temperature rise in Icepak this time. That is confused for me. I wonder why the temperature rise is different. Could you help raise some advice for this situation? Thanks!
 
Hi, though I am not expert on this and I have no experience of the software packages you mention, still want to ask some things:
What do you get if you try even lower frequency , something like ##10^{-20}Hz##
What do you get if you try much higher frequency, something like ##1Hz##.
 
Melon said:
Hi Guys,
I am doing a air coil thermal simulation by Maxwell 3D&Icepak to verify its rated cueernt. First I use Maxwell 3D DC solution type to load DC current and get about 6cel temperature rise in Icepak. But then I want to try this in Maxwell 3D Eddy Current solution type, so I load stranded current with adaptive frequency of 1e-08Hz (which I think is similar to DC current). But I get about 3cel temperature rise in Icepak this time. That is confused for me. I wonder why the temperature rise is different. Could you help raise some advice for this situation? Thanks!
Honestly I wouldn't bother combining EM + Thermal for an air coil. Why? Because the conductive heat transfer of air of so starkly poor.

Also "what frequency DC?" - 1 Hz could be sufficient to be DC; it's "on a spectrum" anyway. For microwave equipment, 50 MHz is "sufficiently DC"! Do a back of the envelope given your calculated inductance of the coil and it's inductive reactance compared to the power source Norton resistance: being within a factor of 10x is already pretty much DC; 100x is easily DC.

The only heat transfer that matters with air at "normal temperatures" is convection and radiation. And very quickly (~300C-500C) radiation dominates. Radiation is far simpler and if it's dominating, it's all you need to worry about.

Convection is highly dependent on the aerodynamics of air flow and odds are a lot of your variability is due to errors in parameters affecting convection which can be chaotic as Navier-Stokes can be chaotic (i.e. laminar vs. turbulent plus dependencies on geometry, gravity, etc.). So it's easy to get variable answers. Also your mesh sizes can create as much error. Always focus on your mesh with FEA.

You can use a hand calculations based on standard pre-defined heat transfer geometries (cubes, cylinders, spheres, slabs, etc.) and get a good answer faster from simply known the IR losses given the coil current levels you are using.

Eddy currents presume and are relevant only for large slabs of coil conductor or core. If you are using wire, there are no eddy currents in the coils and being air there are no eddy currents induced by the coil. If you have really large steel cores that aren't laminated or really large slab coil conductors, sure there will be eddy currents, but even the latter you should be designing the coil/conductors to avoid eddy currents (see how Bitter magnets suppress eddy currents).
 
  • Like
Likes Melon and Delta2
The difference between DC solvers like Magnetostatic and Eddy Current is that with Eddy current you need to input the peak value of current. So for example, a Magnetostatic with 1A current input is NOT same as Eddy Current Simulation with 1A current input. For you to have equivalent conditions Eddy current needs to be loaded with 1*sqrt(2) value of current to imitate same condition as in Magnetostatic (or other DC solvers).

If you see the losses here, it will be differing by twice if same value of current is used in these two different type of solvers. This could be leading to different temperature rise.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top