Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Alpha and Beta

  • I
  • Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date
  • #1
143
4
Hi, I have a question about Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution.

First, because of mass conservataion and energy conservatioin, Sum Ni and Sum EiNi must be constant.
Partial of both sum will be 0.

Is that why we adopted constant alpha as a parametric constant? because without alpha, partial Nj of Sum Ni will be 1 and there must be inequality because partial Nj of Sum Ni has to be 0.


And would that mean alpha and beta will be always 0?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
760
69
If you are trying to extremize some function ##S(N_1, N_2, \dots, N_n)## with respect to some constraint ##f(N_1, N_2, \dots, N_n)=0## it must be that at the extreme point the tangent space of the level set of ##S## coincides with the tangent of the constraint level set. Otherwise you could make a differential change to the ##N_i## in a direction allowed by the constraint and obtain a different value of ##S##. Thus ##S## would not be extremized.

The statement that the level sets have the same tangent space is the same as saying the gradients of ##S## and ##f## must be proportional to one another. We call these proportionality constants Lagrange multipliers.

In the above example there are two constraints instead of one. The constants ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are the Lagrange multipliers. ##\alpha## and ##\beta## will not always be 0.
 

Related Threads on Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Alpha and Beta

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
341
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
943
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top