Maxwell Equation: Magneto Static Limit & Direction of H, B & M

  • Thread starter Thread starter saravanan13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell
AI Thread Summary
In the magneto-static limit, Maxwell's equations simplify to account for constant currents and static fields, eliminating time-dependent terms. The relationship between the magnetic field H, magnetic induction B, and magnetization M is defined, with H generated by free currents and B influenced by both free and bound currents. In a magnetic medium, the vectors H, B, and M generally align in the same direction when exposed to an external field, reinforcing the magnetic effect. However, phenomena like hysteresis can cause misalignment of these vectors when the external field changes. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing magnetic behavior in materials.
saravanan13
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
How does the Maxwell equation turns out in the magneto static limit?
Please explain the context from the fundamental point of view?
What is the direction of the H (field), B (induction) and M (magnetization) in a magnetic medium when exposed to external field?

thanks in well advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you take the Magneto-static limit, you can have constant currents J producing a constant B field. You drop the dB/dt, and dE/dt terms because it's a static problem with no changing fields. So the Maxwell's equations would just look like:

divE=4pi*rho, divB=0, curlE=0, curlB=4pi*J/c

I'm not sure what you mean "explain the context from the fundamental point of view".

If you have a magnetic medium, you have that H=B-4piM. For linear materials B=mu*H. H is produced by only "free" currents while B must take into account both free and bound currents. In general, you will induce magnetization so as to align the magnetic dipoles with the external field, so that the magnetic material "reinforces" the H field to create a much stronger B field (this means that mu>>1 for strongly magnetic materials). I think, then, the vectors should all be pointing in the same direction, at least for this simple case. I think you can get phenomenon like hysteresis where the magnetic dipoles take time to readjust if you change the external field, so in that case, the vectors would not point in the same direction, but could point in different directions. The details are a little complicated...I'll let someone with more expertise explain that.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top