Maxwell fourth equation incorrect?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mdn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of Maxwell's fourth equation, specifically the inclusion of the displacement current term in Ampere's law, represented as Curl H = J + Jd. The participant argues that the divergence of current density J is zero in a capacitor, leading to confusion about the necessity of the displacement current term. However, it is established that the divergence of J is not always zero, particularly in dynamic situations involving AC currents, which necessitates the inclusion of the displacement current to maintain consistency in electromagnetic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations, particularly Ampere's law.
  • Familiarity with the concept of displacement current in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of divergence and curl operations in vector calculus.
  • Basic principles of charge conservation in electric fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maxwell's correction to Ampere's law from charge conservation principles.
  • Explore the implications of displacement current in AC circuits.
  • Learn about the mathematical operations of divergence and curl in the context of electromagnetic fields.
  • Review professional references on electromagnetic theory, such as those available on arXiv.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Maxwell's equations and their applications in AC circuits.

mdn
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi all
this question seems to be silly but i want to where i am wrong. Maxwell was made modification in Amperes law curl H=J and he added new quantity displacement current Jd, reason was that Div.J=0 (true in DC current but not in AC charging capacitor).
but if i say Div J=0 in capacitor because the amount of current entering and leaving is exactly equal in Gaussian loop (loop has half part in space between plate) on the same back direction as it is AC currant and can not flow through capacitor plate, where i am wrong?
and second doubt is that current can not added in series because it is same therefore fourth equation should be
Curl H=2J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mdn said:
Hi all
...reason was that Div.J=0 (true in DC current but not in AC charging capacitor).
but if i say Div J=0 in capacitor because the amount of current entering and leaving is exactly equal in Gaussian loop (loop has half part in space between plate) on the same back direction as it is AC currant and can not flow through capacitor plate, where i am wrong?

The reason for adding displacement current term into the right-hand side of the equation

$$
\nabla\times \mathbf B = \mu_0 \mathbf j
$$

was that divergence of the left-hand side is zero everywhere for any field ##\mathbf B##, while divergence of ##\mathbf j## is not always zero.
 
The current density between the plates of a capacitor is 0.If you igore dE/dt you get that the curl of B is 0 in this area, and this conflicts with reality.
It's easier to see in integral form, where the curl of B integrated around the boundary of a surface is the same for any surface with the same boundary.
If you take a capacitor you can have one surface going through one of the leads, and another surface going through the gap between the plates. If you integrate only the real current and not the displacement current you won't get the same outcome.
 
div of J is zero or not in case of capacitor? if yes then problem in fourth equation
and if no can you prove?
 
Maxwell's correction to Ampere's law can be derived simply from the conservation of charge. See: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0005084

This thread appears to be personal speculation. It is closed unless you can produce a professional reference supporting the alternative form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
17K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K