Maxwell's equations and exterior algebra

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations in differential form notation are discussed primarily in a mathematical context, lacking physical interpretation in the sources referenced. The condition dF = 0 is understood through Poincaré's lemma, indicating that the electromagnetic tensor arises from the exterior derivative of the electromagnetic four-potential. The second condition, d(*F) = J, relates to the conservation of charge, which is more straightforward to grasp. The discussion raises questions about the physical significance of the exterior derivative and its connection to gauge invariance. Overall, while mathematical deductions are clear, the physical implications remain less defined.
Wledig
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Maxwell's equations in differential form notation appeared as a motivating example in a mathematical physics book I'm reading. However, being a mathematical physics book it doesn't delve much into the physical aspects of the problem. It deduces the equations by setting dF equal to zero and d(*F) equal to J, but it doesn't explain why it is doing so. This article I found online does exactly the same thing. I'm left with the impression that this condition is just set in order to obtain the equations. Is that so? If not, is there any physical interpretation here to the exterior derivative? And what about the exterior derivative of the Hodge operator applied to the tensor being equal to the current density?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I can actually make sense of the first condition, since the electromagnetic tensor is defined as the exterior derivative of the electromagnetic four-potential and that by Poincaré's lemma we must have d(dw) = 0, it follows that indeed dF must equal zero. But then again, that's just math, I'm wondering about the physics involved here.
 
If anyone is interested at all, I believe I found an answer here and here. If I understood it correctly, the physics behind the first condition is just gauge invariance? I don't get the cohomology bit though. The second condition is easier to understand as it just translates to conservation of charge.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top