Maxwells Equations and Time Invariance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of time invariance in the dielectric function ε within the context of Maxwell's equations. Participants explore the nature of solutions to these equations, particularly the use of harmonic time dependence represented by the term exp(jωt), and the conditions under which this form is valid. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, potential dependencies, and the nuances of dielectric behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that time dependence in solutions to Maxwell's equations must be harmonic, specifically the significance of exp(jωt).
  • Another participant argues that the dielectric function ε is not truly time invariant due to its frequency dependence, introducing the concept of a loss tangent in dielectrics.
  • Some participants suggest that ε may vary due to external perturbations, which could be considered quasi-stationary compared to optical frequencies.
  • There is mention of nonlinear optics, where ε could be influenced by the field itself if the field strength is sufficient.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their qualifications in optics, indicating a shift in focus to RF microwave transmission lines, while acknowledging the differences in environments.
  • A later reply suggests that the original question about harmonic time dependence relates to principles of energy conservation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the time invariance of the dielectric function and its implications for Maxwell's equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which harmonic time dependence is justified and the nature of ε.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of dielectric behavior, including frequency dependence and potential absorption, which may affect the applicability of certain assumptions in the discussion.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

In my book it says that if the dielectric function ε is time invariant, we can write a solution to Maxwells equations of the form E(r, t) = E(r)exp(jωt). I agree that the ME are separable, but I don't see how they know that the time-dependence is harmonic? What is so special about exp(jωt) in this respect?Niles.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I understand it actually.. I just had to refresh my QM. Thanks.
 
Niles said:
Hi

In my book it says that if the dielectric function ε is time invariant, we can write a solution to Maxwells equations of the form E(r, t) = E(r)exp(jωt). I agree that the ME are separable, but I don't see how they know that the time-dependence is harmonic? What is so special about exp(jωt) in this respect?Niles.

[itex]\epsilon\;[/itex] is not time invariant in the sense because it is frequency dependent which means there is a [itex]\frac{dV}{dt}\;[/itex] dependent. There is no pure lossless dielectric, there is always a loss tangent for all dielectrics.

[tex]\vec E_{(\vec r,t)}=Re[\tilde E_{(\vec r)}e^{j\omega t}] \;\hbox { not }\;\vec E_{(\vec r,t)}=\tilde E_{(\vec r)}e^{j\omega t}[/tex]

And The phasor [itex]\tilde E_{\vec r}\;[/itex] do have the attenuation constant that has frequency dependent part. The question on your statement is whether frequency depend implies time dependent.
 
Last edited:
yungman said:
[itex]\epsilon\;[/itex] is not time invariant in the sense because it is frequency dependent which means there is a [itex]\frac{dV}{dt}\;[/itex] dependent. There is no pure lossless dielectric, there is always a loss tangent for all dielectrics.

Well, there is two things here:

1) ε might vary because of some external perturbation, but that will generally be very slow compared to optical frequencies, so in this sense can say that it is time invariant, so it is quasi stationary

2) ε might be influenced by the field itself assuming the field is strong enough -> nonlinear optics

I guess (1) is relevant for our discussion. That ε = ε(ω) means we have dispersion. Only if ε is complex do we have absorption.
 
Niles said:
Well, there is two things here:

1) ε might vary because of some external perturbation, but that will generally be very slow compared to optical frequencies, so in this sense can say that it is time invariant, so it is quasi stationary

2) ε might be influenced by the field itself assuming the field is strong enough -> nonlinear optics

I guess (1) is relevant for our discussion. That ε = ε(ω) means we have dispersion. Only if ε is complex do we have absorption.

I am going to stop here, I don't know optics, I based on RF microwave tx line which is still EM, but the environment is completely different and I am not qualified to talk on this. Sorry.
 
No need to apologize. Thanks for helping. By the way, the answer to my original question was (in principle) energy conservation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
997
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K