MCNP volumetric source definition

AI Thread Summary
To define a cubic volumetric source in MCNP code, utilize the SDEF card with x, y, and z parameters. For a parallelepiped centered at (0, 0, 0) with dimensions of 40 cm, 10 cm, and 4 cm, specify the source definition using SI and SP cards to set the limits for each dimension. The example provided includes SI1, SI2, and SI3 for the x, y, and z coordinates, respectively, along with corresponding SP values. This method allows for precise control over the source geometry within the simulation. Proper implementation of these parameters is crucial for accurate modeling in MCNP.
Lujain
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am now in the process to define a cubic volumetric source in mcnp code, does anyone have a clear explanation for that.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
Use x, y, z parameters in SDEF. For example for a parallepiped centered in (0, 0, 0) with a dimension (40 cm, 10 cm, 4 cm) :
SDEF X=d1 Y=d2 Z=d3 ...
SI1 -20 20
SP1 0 1
SI2 -5 5
SP2 0 1
SI3 -2 2
SP3 0 1
PSR
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top