Mean Input Power & Q value , Damped Harmonic Motion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the quality factor (Q) in the context of damped harmonic motion. The user initially struggles with the definitions and equations, particularly the relationship between Q, the resonant frequency (ω_0), and damping coefficient (ϒ). Through dialogue, they discover that Q can be defined in terms of bandwidth, leading to the realization that Q equals 25 based on the given half-power points. This conclusion is reached by applying the formula for Q in relation to frequency changes. The user expresses satisfaction upon solving the problem, indicating a successful understanding of the concepts involved.
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


33333.JPG


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm working on part a.

The numerical value of Q.

I have an equation stating that Q = ω_0/ϒ.

I don't really know what ϒ is, in other places (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waves/node13.html) it seems like the frequency.

But, I also do not have w_0. So perhaps this is the wrong equation or perhaps I am looking at it wrong.

I also have: P_max = (1/2) * (Q*F_0^2)/(m*w_0)
but I do not think this helps directly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
but I do not think this helps directly
Correct. What would help is an expression for P as a function of ##\omega##. Because from the picture you can see that P halves when you are ##\omega/50## away from ##\omega_0## ...

Time to fill in the blank under "2. Homework Equations " :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Sometimes with foreign topics it is hard to know what is a relevant equation and what is irrelevant :p.

P(w) = F_0^2*w_0/(2*K*Q) * [1/((w_0/w-w/w_0)^2 + 1/Q^2)]

At w = w_0, we get it to be maximized.

P(w) = F_0^2*w_0*Q/2K

i'm not entirely sure how this helps, tho.
As we do not know F_0, other then that it is held constant.
w_0 is unknown, but you are saying that P halves when we are w/50 away from w_0. Why 50?

If we take (1/2)*P(w) = F_0^2*w_0*Q/4K

That doesn't seem to help.

I am guessing that I am not making a connecting between F_0, K, and w_0?
 
From the picture we see ##P(\omega_0 + \omega_0/50) = {1\over 2} P(\omega_0)##. A lot of the factors that bother you divide out when you work out this equation...and who knows, you end up with something containing ##Q## ...
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
It would be instructive to look up the definition of the Q factor. There is a definition that involves bandwidth (-3 dB, or half-power points) that will be of particular interest.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Definition of Q factor : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor

So, reformatting my previous equation we see:

2*K*P(w_0)/w_0*F_0^2 = Q

How would the definition of Q help me here? I would think that we are looking for Q so we do not want to replace it with anything.

Maybe this is it: P(max) = Q*F_0^2/(2m*w_0)
If I input this in for P(w_0) then we see

k*Q/(m*w_0^2) = Q
But then I cancel out Q and I'm stuck.

k/(m*w_0^2) = 1
 
RJLiberator said:
How would the definition of Q help me here? I would think that we are looking for Q so we do not want to replace it with anything.
Sure you would! Q has a definition in terms of the bandwidth. The bandwidth is defined in terms of the half-power points. You are given the half power points on the diagram in terms of the resonant frequency ##\omega_o##. So, what's the bandwidth on your diagram?
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
0.04w_0 = bandwidth = Q ?
 
RJLiberator said:
0.04w_0 = bandwidth = Q ?
Go back to the Wikipedia page and look at the definition of Q in terms of the bandwidth!
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #10
Aha.,

f_0/The change in frequency = Q

So, w_0/0.04*w_0 = 1/0.04 = 25 is the value for Q!
 
  • #11
RJLiberator said:
Aha.,

f_0/The change in frequency = Q

So, w_0/0.04*w_0 = 1/0.04 = 25 is the value for Q!
Huzzah! Yes!
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
  • #12
Solved ! Thank you kindly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
841
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K