Mean Input Power & Q value , Damped Harmonic Motion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 2K views
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


33333.JPG


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm working on part a.

The numerical value of Q.

I have an equation stating that Q = ω_0/ϒ.

I don't really know what ϒ is, in other places (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waves/node13.html) it seems like the frequency.

But, I also do not have w_0. So perhaps this is the wrong equation or perhaps I am looking at it wrong.

I also have: P_max = (1/2) * (Q*F_0^2)/(m*w_0)
but I do not think this helps directly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
but I do not think this helps directly
Correct. What would help is an expression for P as a function of ##\omega##. Because from the picture you can see that P halves when you are ##\omega/50## away from ##\omega_0## ...

Time to fill in the blank under "2. Homework Equations " :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Sometimes with foreign topics it is hard to know what is a relevant equation and what is irrelevant :p.

P(w) = F_0^2*w_0/(2*K*Q) * [1/((w_0/w-w/w_0)^2 + 1/Q^2)]

At w = w_0, we get it to be maximized.

P(w) = F_0^2*w_0*Q/2K

i'm not entirely sure how this helps, tho.
As we do not know F_0, other then that it is held constant.
w_0 is unknown, but you are saying that P halves when we are w/50 away from w_0. Why 50?

If we take (1/2)*P(w) = F_0^2*w_0*Q/4K

That doesn't seem to help.

I am guessing that I am not making a connecting between F_0, K, and w_0?
 
From the picture we see ##P(\omega_0 + \omega_0/50) = {1\over 2} P(\omega_0)##. A lot of the factors that bother you divide out when you work out this equation...and who knows, you end up with something containing ##Q## ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
It would be instructive to look up the definition of the Q factor. There is a definition that involves bandwidth (-3 dB, or half-power points) that will be of particular interest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Definition of Q factor : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor

So, reformatting my previous equation we see:

2*K*P(w_0)/w_0*F_0^2 = Q

How would the definition of Q help me here? I would think that we are looking for Q so we do not want to replace it with anything.

Maybe this is it: P(max) = Q*F_0^2/(2m*w_0)
If I input this in for P(w_0) then we see

k*Q/(m*w_0^2) = Q
But then I cancel out Q and I'm stuck.

k/(m*w_0^2) = 1
 
RJLiberator said:
How would the definition of Q help me here? I would think that we are looking for Q so we do not want to replace it with anything.
Sure you would! Q has a definition in terms of the bandwidth. The bandwidth is defined in terms of the half-power points. You are given the half power points on the diagram in terms of the resonant frequency ##\omega_o##. So, what's the bandwidth on your diagram?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
0.04w_0 = bandwidth = Q ?
 
RJLiberator said:
0.04w_0 = bandwidth = Q ?
Go back to the Wikipedia page and look at the definition of Q in terms of the bandwidth!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Aha.,

f_0/The change in frequency = Q

So, w_0/0.04*w_0 = 1/0.04 = 25 is the value for Q!
 
RJLiberator said:
Aha.,

f_0/The change in frequency = Q

So, w_0/0.04*w_0 = 1/0.04 = 25 is the value for Q!
Huzzah! Yes!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Solved ! Thank you kindly.