Mean Value Theorem: Proving Inequalities with f'(x)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Mean Value Theorem to prove the inequalities involving the derivative of a function, specifically that min[f'] ≤ (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a) ≤ max[f']. It is established that for some x* in the interval (a, b), the derivative f'(x*) equals (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a). The participants clarify that the maximum and minimum values of f' on the interval bound this expression. The conclusion emphasizes that since min[f'] ≤ f'(x) ≤ max[f'] holds for all x, it directly leads to the desired inequalities. The explanation effectively illustrates the relationship between the function's derivative and the changes in function values over the interval.
kidia
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Please help me on this.

If f`(x) is continuous on [a,b],apply the Mean Value Theorem to prove the inequalities min[f`] \leq f(b)-f(a)/_ b-a \leq [Max f`]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kidia said:
Please help me on this.

If f`(x) is continuous on [a,b],apply the Mean Value Theorem to prove the inequalities min[f`] \leq f(b)-f(a)/_ b-a \leq [Max f`]
well
f'(x)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
for some x in (a,b)
so what are the biggest and smallest possible values of
(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
 
please lurflurf clarify more and give me the values
 
kidia said:
please lurflurf clarify more and give me the values
Ok
remember a<x<b
x* is some number in the interval so
f'(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
M>=f'(x) for all x
M>=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
max(f')>=f'(x) for all x
so
max(f')>=f(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
the min case is analogous

The idea is f'(x) may be greater than, less than, or equal to (f(b)-f(a))/(b-a).
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
so since for some x*
f'(x*)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
and for all x
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
then
min[f`]<=f(b)-f(a) b-a <=[Max f`]
since
min(f')<=f'(x)<=max(f')
is true for all x
including
min(f')<=f'(x*)<=max(f')
 
Thanx a lot lurflurf
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top