Meaning of the square root and its contradiction

kntsy
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Is square root a function in this way?

f:\mathbb C\rightarrow\mathbb R^+

However contradiction can be drawn:\sqrt{x^2}=|x|\text{ and } i^2=-1

\sqrt{-1}=\sqrt{i^2}=|i|=1
\sqrt{-1}=1 ??What is the problem in the definition or the deduction?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kntsy said:
Is square root a function in this way?

f:\mathbb C\rightarrow\mathbb R^+
No, it's not- the square root function is from \mathbb C to \mathbb C. And functions, on the complex numbers, are not in general "single valued".

However contradiction can be drawn:


\sqrt{x^2}=|x|\text{ and } i^2=-1

\sqrt{-1}=\sqrt{i^2}=|i|=1
\sqrt{-1}=1 ??


What is the problem in the definition or the deduction?
The problem is with your definition, which is wrong.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, it's not- the square root function is from \mathbb C to \mathbb C. And functions, on the complex numbers, are not in general "single valued".

That's a quite narrow view. It might not be the most mathematically useful way, but you might as well define Sqrt to be the principal value. Just as some people use Ln() instead of ln(). This makes writing out equations much easier because you have actual functions.

In this case the answer to the question is
\sqrt{x^2}\neq |x|
for complex numbers!
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, it's not- the square root function is from \mathbb C to \mathbb C. And functions, on the complex numbers, are not in general "single valued".
What does it mean for function not being single-valued? Does it violate the definition of function?
Gerenuk said:
In this case the answer to the question is
\sqrt{x^2}\neq |x|
for complex numbers!

Is it due to the definition of absolute value on complex number?
 
Is it due to the definition of absolute value on complex number?

I suppose you could say that. A very important identity for complex numbers is x \bar{ x } = | x |^2, so the correct identity relating square roots and absolute value (usually called modulus when extended to complex numbers) is | x | = \sqrt{ x \bar{ x } }. The reason that you're familiar with the identity | x | = \sqrt{ x^2 } for real numbers is that for a real number x, x=\bar{x}, so x\bar{x}=x^2.
 
The definition of "function" for real numbers requires that f(a) be a unique number. To use Gerunuk's phrase, that is too "narrow" a view for complex numbers.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top