What is the Measure of an Unbounded Set in Lebesgue Outer Measure Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funky1981
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Set
AI Thread Summary
In Lebesgue Outer Measure Theory, the measure of an unbounded set A can be analyzed through its intersection with bounded sets. The discussion explores the implications of the condition m(A∩B)≤(3/4)m(B) for every bounded set B, leading to the conclusion that m(A) could potentially be 0, greater than 0 but less than infinity, or infinite. A key point raised is that m(A) = 0 is indeed possible, as demonstrated by the example of the rational numbers. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the properties of Lebesgue measure, particularly how the whole space can be expressed as a countable union of finite-measure sets. Ultimately, the measure of A remains uncertain without further constraints or information.
Funky1981
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Suppose A is not a bounded set and m(A∩B)≤(3/4)m(B) for every B. what is m(A)??

here, m is Lebesgue Outer Measure

My attemption is :

Let An=A∩[-n,n], then m(A)=lim m(An)= lim m(An∩[-n,n]) ≤ lim (3/4)m([-n,n]) = infinite.

is my solution right? I am confusing m(A) < infinite , it doest make sense for me. Could someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you wrote is correct as far as it goes, but ##m(A) \leq \infty## doesn't tell you anything new: this is of course true of the outer measure of any set.

Certainly ##m(A) = 0## is possible: consider ##A = \mathbb{Q}##, for example.

Is ##m(A) > 0## possible? Hint: consider ##A = B##.
 
There are three possible cases worth thinking about.
- m(A)=0, which jbunniii showed is possible.
- 0&lt;m(A)&lt;\infty, for which jbunniii provided a very useful hint.
- m(A)=\infty... Is this possible? Consider the sets A_n=A\cap[-n,n] you defined. If we have to have 0&lt;m(A_n)&lt;\infty for some n\in \mathbb N (Is this true?), then maybe the same trick as above can be reused.

It's worth noting that the answer to this question depends on a special property of the Lebesgue measure on \mathbb R, which fails for some other infinite measures. Namely, we're using the property that the whole space is a countable union of finite-measure sets.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top