Measure the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet

AI Thread Summary
To measure the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet, an astronaut uses a 0.055 kg ball suspended from a 0.95 m wire with a linear density of 1.2*10^-4 kg/m. The time for a transverse pulse to travel the wire is recorded at 0.016 s. The initial calculations for pulse velocity were incorrect; the correct velocity is determined using distance over time, yielding 59.38 m/s. Subsequently, the acceleration due to gravity is recalculated to be 7.69 m/s². The revised calculations are confirmed as accurate.
rayhan619
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To measure the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet, an astronut hangs a 0.055 kg ball from the end of a wire. the wire has a length of 0.95 n and a linear density of 1.2*10
^-14 kg/m. using electronic equipment, the astronaut measures the time for a transverse pulse to travel the length of the wire and obtains a value of 0.016 s. the mass of the wire is negligible compared to the mass of the ball.
a) draw a nice picture
b) calculate the velocity of the pulse
c)determine the acceleration due to gravity

Homework Equations



f = v/2L
v = (Mg/mu)^sq. root

The Attempt at a Solution



m = 0.055 kg
L = 0.95 m
mu = 1.2*10^-4 kg/m
T = 0.016 s

b)f = 1/0.016s = 62.5 hz
v = 2fL = 2*62.5 hz*0.95 m = 118.75 m/s

c)g = (v^2*mu)/M = {(118.75 m/s)^2*1.2*10^-4 kg/m}/0.055 kg = 30.77 m/s^2

i got both of them wrong. where did i screw up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rayhan619 said:
b)f = 1/0.016s = 62.5 hz
v = 2fL = 2*62.5 hz*0.95 m = 118.75 m/s
This is a pulse, not a standing wave. The speed of the pulse is simply distance/time.
 
a) i have attached the picture to check it.

so for b) v = L/t = 0.95 m/ 0.016 s = 59.38 ms^-1

and c) g = {(59.38 m/s)^2 * 1.2*10^-4 kg/m}/ 0.055 kg = 7.69 m?s^2.

right?
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    4.2 KB · Views: 930
Looks good to me.
 
appreciate it man
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top