# Measure theoretically equivalent

• Edwinkumar
In summary, theoretically equivalent measures refer to two different ways of measuring the same concept or phenomenon that have been carefully designed and tested to produce consistent and comparable results. To determine if two measures are theoretically equivalent, researchers typically use statistical techniques such as correlation analysis or factor analysis. Having theoretically equivalent measures is important because it allows for comparison and combination of data from different studies, populations, or time points. While measures can be theoretically equivalent but produce different results, these differences should be minimal and not significantly impact the overall conclusions. However, there may be potential drawbacks to using theoretically equivalent measures, such as complexity and the possibility of inaccurate or misleading conclusions if not properly validated or interpreted.
Edwinkumar
When are two or more measures said to be measure theoretically equivalent?
I have spent sometime on searching it; I am not getting it. Please someone help.

(Since it is not widely-known terminology, we can only guess at it.)

I couldn't find this terminology in books. When I was reading a paper I-divergence geometry of distributions by I.CSISZAR, I came across this term. Initially I thought it could be mutually absolutely continuous; but its not. I couldn't make any guess.

## 1. What does it mean for two measures to be theoretically equivalent?

Theoretically equivalent measures are two different ways of measuring the same concept or phenomenon that have been carefully designed and tested to produce consistent and comparable results. This means that the measures are based on the same underlying theoretical framework and have similar properties and performance.

## 2. How can we determine if two measures are theoretically equivalent?

To determine if two measures are theoretically equivalent, researchers typically use statistical techniques such as correlation analysis or factor analysis to assess the level of agreement or overlap between the measures. They may also conduct pilot studies or experiments to compare the measures and assess their validity and reliability.

## 3. Why is it important for measures to be theoretically equivalent?

Having theoretically equivalent measures is important because it allows researchers to compare and combine data from different studies, populations, or time points. This helps to build a more robust and comprehensive understanding of a particular concept or phenomenon and can lead to more accurate and generalizable conclusions.

## 4. Can measures be theoretically equivalent but produce different results?

Yes, it is possible for measures to be theoretically equivalent but produce different results. This could be due to differences in measurement error, sampling bias, or other factors that affect the accuracy or precision of the measures. However, as long as the measures are theoretically equivalent, these differences should be minimal and not significantly impact the overall conclusions.

## 5. Are there any potential drawbacks to using theoretically equivalent measures?

One potential drawback of using theoretically equivalent measures is that they may be more complex and time-consuming to develop and test compared to using a single measure. Additionally, if the measures are not properly validated or interpreted, they may lead to inaccurate or misleading conclusions. It is important for researchers to carefully consider and address these potential drawbacks when using theoretically equivalent measures in their research.

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
411
Replies
85
Views
5K
Replies
95
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K