Must the State |O,ready> Be Orthogonal to |O,reads up> and |O,reads down>?

deneve
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
In the measurement ansatz below, must the state |O,ready> be orthogonal to |O,reads up> and |O,reads down>]?

|+x> |O,ready> =1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready> (1)

---------→ 1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready> (2)


--------→ 1/(sqrt2)[|+z>|O,reads up> + |-z>|O,reads down>] (3)


If |O,ready> = [a|O,reads up> + b|O,reads down>] was applied to (2) then it would give an entangled state and if a,b were functions of time then a suitable a and b can't be found that a hamiltonian could reach since

1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] |O,ready>
= 1/(sqrt2)[|+z> + |-z>] [a|O,reads up> + b|O,reads down>]

=1/(sqrt2)(a|+z>|O,reads up>+b|+z>|O,reads down>+a|-z>|O,reads up>+b|-z|O,reads down>) which cannot equal (3) for any a,b.

Am I correct here?
Many thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.Yes, you are correct. The state |O,ready> must be orthogonal to both |O,reads up> and |O,reads down> in order for the measurement ansatz to be valid.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top