Measuring Spin of Qubit: Analyzing Algebraic States

  • Thread starter Thread starter barnflakes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurements Spin
barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
I read in a book:

For a qubit defined as: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)

Since |0\rangle and |1\rangle are the eigenstates of \sigma_z then measuring sigma_z will yield either |0\rangle or |1\rangle. Measuring \sigma_x on the same qubit will give one of the eigenstates of \sigma_x, which are \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle) and \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle - |1\rangle).

Only problem is I don't see how you can obtain these general/algebraic states? When I make a measurement on the qubit ie. ((\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\langle 0| +\langle1|))\sigma_x(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)) I just obtain a number? How can I keep this algebraic structure and prove the above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is your question?

In the last example you have calculated \langle \psi | \sigma_x | \psi \rangle which is the expectation value of \sigma_x for the state |\psi \rangle. The expectation value is a number.
 
The question appears to be "How do you express the eigenvectors of \sigma_x as linear combinations of eigenvectors of \sigma_z?". I don't have time to answer that right now, so I'll leave it for someone else.
 
Fredrik said:
The question appears to be "How do you express the eigenvectors of \sigma_x as linear combinations of eigenvectors of \sigma_z?". I don't have time to answer that right now, so I'll leave it for someone else.

Yes exactly this!
 
The representation of \sigma_x in the basis of the eigenvectors of \sigma_z is
\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]
So if you diagonalize that you will get the eigenvectors, which will be (1,1) and (1,-1). The eigenvectors for \sigma_z in this basis are of course (1,0) and (0,1)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
515
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top