Measuring Spin Component of Particle with S=1 & Sz=1

salsero
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
For a particle with S = 1 in a state of Sz = 1, what are the probabilities to obtain the various values of the spin component if measured along a direction which makes an angle Q relative to the z-axis?

Is there a general method for an arbitrary value of S?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, a system with spin J (and maximum projection along the z-axis of J) can be treated as 2J spin 1/2 particles. A projection of J along z would correspond to all of these pointing up.

If we rotate by an angle &phi;, then each spin 1/2 has a probability P(+)=[cos(&phi;/2)]^2 of having projection "up" along z, and a probability P(-)=[sin(&phi;/2)]^2 of being "down". For that whole system to have projection K (where |K|<=2J), then we will have J+K spins pointing up and J-K spins pointing down. The probability of this projection is expressed in terms of P(+) and P(-), such that

P(K)=(2J choose J+K)*P(+)^(J+K)*P(-)^(J-K)

where "2J choose J+K" is equal to (2J)!/[(J+K)!(J-K)!]
 
Sounds great!

Is this something you thought about now, or you read/learned this trick somewhere in the past?
 
Actually, it was an assignment question a few weeks ago :wink:
 
BTW, this method works very well in other cases. For example, if you're deriving rotation matrices for a spin 1 particle, it is often simpler to express its basis as a combination of the standard spin 1/2 basis (spin up, spin down) using a tensor product and expand things out that way.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top