Measuring the Movement of the Stars

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the complexities of measuring the movement of celestial bodies, considering the various frames of reference involved due to the relative motion of Earth, the Sun, the Milky Way, and other cosmic structures. Participants explore how these movements affect the perception of speed and the methodologies used in astronomy to quantify motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to accurately measure the speed of celestial objects given the relative motions of various cosmic entities.
  • Another participant suggests that speed is relative and can be defined between any two objects, challenging the notion of a universal rest frame.
  • A later reply discusses the necessity of specifying a reference frame when measuring velocities in astronomy, noting that observations are typically made from Earth's perspective.
  • It is proposed that the "local standard of rest" (LSR) is used to describe the motion of nearby stars, and further deductions can be made to account for the Milky Way's rotation and the motion of the Local Group of galaxies.
  • Participants elaborate on the use of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) as a reference frame for cosmological models, detailing how velocities can be calculated relative to it.
  • Specific examples are provided, such as measuring the velocity of the Andromeda galaxy relative to Earth and the Sun, highlighting the complexities involved in these calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that speed is relative and depends on the chosen reference frame, but there is no consensus on the best approach to measure celestial motion or which reference frame is most appropriate for different contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of measuring motion due to the dependence on various reference frames and the complexities involved in accounting for multiple layers of motion in the universe.

ScientificMind
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
I was wondering, since the Earth is constantly moving around the sun, the sun is moving around the milky way, and the milky way is moving through space (and for all I know the milky way might also be rotating around our local group, cluster, super cluster, etc.), how do we know how fast anything is moving? For example, it seems like if two objects are moving away from one another at say 2 m/s, from the point of view of either one it would look like it was standing still while the other was moving away at 4 m/s.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, by definition, speed is measured between any two objects and either can self-label as the one which is "standing still" (unless there is acceleration). You may be struggling under the misconception that there is a universal rest frame against which a "true" speed can be measured.
 
russ_watters said:
Yes, by definition, speed is measured between any two objects and either can self-label as the one which is "standing still" (unless there is acceleration). You may be struggling under the misconception that there is a universal rest frame against which a "true" speed can be measured.
I suppose that I didn't think of it that way, thank you. Though that raises another question for me, what do we do instead to measure the motion of celestial bodies? That is, do we measure them using the Earth as "standing still," do we simply measure them in a general sense of motion without bothering to give them exact speeds, or is it something completely different?
 
ScientificMind said:
I suppose that I didn't think of it that way, thank you. Though that raises another question for me, what do we do instead to measure the motion of celestial bodies? That is, do we measure them using the Earth as "standing still," do we simply measure them in a general sense of motion without bothering to give them exact speeds, or is it something completely different?
There's always a reference frame specified or implied when talking about velocities in astronomy. All observations are by necessity conducted from the reference frame of Earth, so you'll always get a speed w/r to Earth as the basis.
When the daily and yearly motions of our planet are deducted from it, we get motion w/r to the so called "local standard of rest" (LSR), that is w/r to the Sun and its closest neighbourhood. This is a good reference frame to describe motion of nearby stars.
You can then deduct the rotation of Milky Way to get the galactic reference frame. This one is useful for describing interactions with other galaxies.
You can talk about the reference frame of the centre of mass of the Local Group of galaxies if you deduct the relative motion of MW with respect to it.
You can also talk about the frame of reference of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) if you deduct all the other contributions. This frame of reference is used by most cosmological models to describe the global behaviour of the universe.

So, let's say you measure the divergence from homogenity of the CMBR - you look at the sky, notice that CMBR is blue-shifted in one direction and redshifted in the opposite one, and using Doppler shift you calculate the velocity of Earth relative to CMBR.

Then you may deduct the velocity of Earth's rotation, which will amount to some 0.5km/s (fluctuating daily), the velocity of Earth's revolution (30km/s fluctuating yearly), the velocity of Sun around the galactic centre (iirc ~240km/s fluctuating every 250 million years, so practically constant from our human perspective), the velocity of MW moving towards Andromeda Galaxy (110km/s) and you end up with some ~650km/s velocity of the Local Group w/r to the CMBR.

Another example, you look at the Andromeda galaxy, use doppler shift to find its approach velocity as seen from Earth, deduct the quickly changing velocity of rotation and revolution of the planet, and you end up with the velocity w/r to the Sun of about 300km/s (the "helio-radial velocity" in the wikipedia article on Andromeda). Then you may deduct the galactic orbital motion of the Sun to conclude that the actual speed of approach between the two galaxies is the 110km/s mentioned earlier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K