Measuring very small voltages and currents

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for measuring very small voltages and currents, particularly in the context of AC waveforms that are significantly smaller than the micro prefix. Participants explore various techniques, devices, and challenges associated with accurately measuring these small signals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using a step-up transformer to measure small AC voltages, while others clarify that transformers are typically used for AC and question the specifics of the measurements.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of transformers, particularly regarding noise amplification when stepping up audio signals.
  • Participants mention the use of oscilloscopes and sigma-delta receivers as potential tools for measuring small signals.
  • Noise sources, particularly thermal electrical noise, are highlighted as significant challenges when measuring small signals, with suggestions to maximize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Some participants propose using integrating ADCs to suppress interference from line frequencies, while others discuss the importance of amplification using instrumentation amplifiers.
  • There are references to various tutorials and articles that may provide further insights into the measurement techniques and noise analysis.
  • One participant shares experiences from industrial applications, noting the practical limits of measurement accuracy due to noise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the best methods for measuring small voltages and currents, with no clear consensus on a single approach. The discussion includes both agreement on the importance of noise considerations and differing opinions on specific techniques and devices.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of measuring small signals due to noise and the need for specific devices and methods, but do not resolve the various approaches discussed. Limitations related to the definitions of small signals and the dependence on specific measurement contexts are acknowledged.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for engineers, researchers, and students interested in electrical measurement techniques, particularly in contexts where precision and noise management are critical.

K Murty
Messages
34
Reaction score
17
Hello.
How would this be done? Using a step up transformer?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you be a little more specific? How small? A transformer will only work with AC, not DC. What is it that you are measuring? If you have access to an oscilloscope, that might be a way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and K Murty
scottdave said:
Can you be a little more specific? How small? A transformer will only work with AC, not DC. What is it that you are measuring? If you have access to an oscilloscope, that might be a way.
I am not measuring anything, but I am wondering how one would measure AC waveforms that are very small in magnitude, even smaller than the micro prefix. I know transformers are used to step down high voltages so they can be measured by voltmeters and for safety. So I was wondering if the opposite use, to step up small voltages and currents so they can be measured by instruments, is a use for transformers?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and K Murty
dlgoff said:
When a transformer is used to step up the audio voltages from a microphone or pickup, it steps up the noise voltage that comes with it.
Excellent point.
@K Murty -- can you say a bit about the small signal noise sources that you've been reading about, and how to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when dealing with small signals in the presence of noise sources (natural and human-generated)? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and K Murty
berkeman said:
Excellent point.
@K Murty -- can you say a bit about the small signal noise sources that you've been reading about, and how to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when dealing with small signals in the presence of noise sources (natural and human-generated)? :smile:
I will reply in some time. :thumbup:
 
K Murty said:
I will reply in some time. :thumbup:
Thanks.

Hint -- the main natural noise source I've had to deal with is thermal electrical noise. That should help your search terms... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: K Murty
berkeman said:
Excellent point.
@K Murty -- can you say a bit about the small signal noise sources that you've been reading about, and how to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when dealing with small signals in the presence of noise sources (natural and human-generated)? :smile:

I believe you would use some of the devices and methods mentioned in your post. I am having a hard time finding the correct material on how to minimise noise from small signal sources.

I think the integrating A D converted is key here...
berkeman said:
Thanks.

Hint -- the main natural noise source I've had to deal with is thermal electrical noise. That should help your search terms... :smile:
I would think cooling!
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
We use a sigma-delta receiver with decimation to achieve about 80dB quiet line receive performance...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta-sigma_modulation
From the wikipedia link,
Primarily because of its cost efficiency and reduced circuit complexity, this technique has found increasing use in modern electronic components such as DACs, ADCs, frequency synthesizers, switched-mode power supplies and motor controllers.
I'm trying to visualize, circuit wise, how this would be applied to motor controllers. I'll be doing some searching but if you know of any good sources, could you provide them here? However this may be a little off-topic.

edit: Never mind berkeman. I just found this that looks good. http://www.analog.com/en/technical-articles/sigma-delta-conversion-used-for-motor-control.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and berkeman
  • #11
Think in terms of energy present in your signal.
A very feeble AC will get more feeble when it has to energize the core of a transformer.
That's why we usually use an interface circuit to make it energetic enough to drive a conventional instrument.

Tutorial here, don't be scared off by the math on first few pages...
http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slap103/slap103.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and K Murty
  • #12
K Murty said:
I think the integrating A D converted is key here...
Integrating ADC does a wonderful job. If you integrate for one line cycle you have really suppressed line frequency interference because integral of a sinewave is zero... but it's slow. old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: K Murty
  • #13
jim hardy said:
Tutorial here, don't be scared off by the math on first few pages...
http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slap103/slap103.pdf
Dang Jim. Where do you find this good stuff? This quote from the tutorial is priceless IMO.

Many engineers, used to getting steady values from their low-resolution converters, are dismayed when they
find the output value of a 24-bit device fluctuating madly in its least significant bits. It’s not hard for an engineer,
long used to working with low-resolution devices, to feel a bit cheated when he finds out that a 24-bit device isn’t
really 24 bits when noise is taken into account!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #14
Most everything in nature is moving if you look at it close enough. In the plant it was not practical to measure closer than 0.1%, a part per thousand, because every signal has "noise" imposed on it. 0.1% takes only a 10 or 11 bit ADC. We installed a 14 bit (15 including sign) ADC for our computer because its drift and nonlinearity were so small relative to our 10 bit need that it could go for years between calibrations. That saved a LOT of man-hours.

There's a whole niche industry focused on analyzing that 'noise' riding atop process signals.
https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.469664!/In-Core%20Neutron%20Noise%20Analysis%20for%20Diagnosis%20of%20Fuel%20Assembly%20Vibrations.pdf

upload_2018-7-20_14-0-19.png
typically one uses an analog high pass filter to block the steady state signal and amplify just the noise, then a fast ADC connected to a FFT analyzer.
In my day that took 200 pounds of computer equipment, nowadays they do it with a DSP processor that fits in your shirt pocket.


old jim
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-7-20_14-0-19.png
    upload_2018-7-20_14-0-19.png
    21.7 KB · Views: 635
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, berkeman and K Murty
  • #15
jim hardy said:
We installed a 14 bit (15 including sign) ADC for our computer because its drift and nonlinearity were so small relative to our 10 bit need that it could go for years between calibrations.
You da man. :bow:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #16
The first thing I would do is amplify the signal using an instrumentation amplifier.
For low voltage precision DC signals, a zero-drift chopper amplifier might be an advantage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: K Murty, dlgoff and Tom.G
  • #17
I think I would have to read up significantly more on the posts made here, thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K